From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@nvidia.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, cai.huoqing@linux.dev,
brgl@bgdev.pl, chenhao288@hisilicon.com,
huangguangbin2@huawei.com,
David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/1] mlxbf_gige: Fix kernel panic at shutdown
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:17:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612131707.GS12152@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230612123718.u6cfggybbtx4owbq@skbuf>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:37:18PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:59:25PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, the calls to .shutdown() and .remove() are
> > mutually exclusive.
>
> In this particular case, or in general?
>
> In general they aren't. If the owning bus driver also implements its .shutdown()
> as .remove(), then it will call the .remove() method of all devices on that bus.
> That, after .shutdown() had already been called for those same children.
Can you please help me to see how? What is the call chain?
From what I see callback to ->shutdown() iterates over all devices in
that bus and relevant bus will check that driver is bound prior to call
to driver callback. In both cases, the driver is removed and bus won't
call to already removed device.
If it does, it is arguably bug in bus logic, which needs to prevent such
scenario.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 14:03 [PATCH net v2 1/1] mlxbf_gige: Fix kernel panic at shutdown Asmaa Mnebhi
2023-06-08 23:25 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2023-06-12 17:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-11 18:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-12 11:34 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-06-12 11:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-12 12:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-12 13:17 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-06-12 13:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-12 13:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-12 14:05 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-13 7:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-13 8:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-13 9:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-13 9:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-13 10:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-13 10:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-13 11:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-06-13 11:40 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230612131707.GS12152@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=asmaa@nvidia.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=cai.huoqing@linux.dev \
--cc=chenhao288@hisilicon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davthompson@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=huangguangbin2@huawei.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).