From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B257F for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67AC5C433C8; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686764494; bh=CUYf/mEpnKS33qUE+7VaJsixEwVTMHMSW91RBVToosY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lxFxPw+HduQci86H431rVnO0ky88Vyd80gifwZwDt20Aayq0gTdLtw9Gwm1y1EHIP +xSQKczG7lMjyH1rOan1kA52MLvzSNGrKlkbxsqm1dzw4XxAttHGBR9BzNgtqPGIIo yFCNLlr/GcqHkjxOxfpQQlDDgBQahvKrXTXcH3/rWpdKuPfmv6PlL1k5lb0PWk757U RsVh8lKGdxwlJhErb5onZmrHjmzIFacTTyNaMzXLqBQDEXy/LB6pUmiCXDWQPkd1jF 9Ehmu2grRTP0T6T3Jl8rP2GEdxz/a9wpVemFtCHZbA3tF2OvJSOuRySsEfrhQFxx8A OLeetvW578BSQ== Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:41:33 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Stephen Rothwell , David Miller , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Mat Martineau , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Message-ID: <20230614104133.55c93a32@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230614111752.74207e28@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:51:16 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote: > I added a note about the conflicts on the cover-letter: > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230609-upstream-net-20230610-mptcp-selftests-support-old-kernels-part-3-v1-0-2896fe2ee8a3@tessares.net/ > > Maybe it was not a good place? I didn't know where to put it as there > were multiple patches that were conflicting with each others even if the > major conflicts were between 47867f0a7e83 ("selftests: mptcp: join: skip > check if MIB counter not supported") and 0639fa230a21 ("selftests: > mptcp: add explicit check for new mibs"). I guess next time I should add > a comment referring to the cover-letter in the patches creating conflicts. Hm, yeah, I think the cover letter may not be the best way. Looks like Stephen didn't use it, anyway, and it confused patchwork. No better idea where to put it tho :( Maybe a link to a git rerere resolution uploaded somewhere we can wget from easily?