Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c

between commit:

  37b61cda9c16 ("bnxt: don't handle XDP in netpoll")

from the net tree and commit:

  2b56b3d99241 ("eth: bnxt: handle invalid Tx completions more gracefully")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

idiff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 06b238bef9dd,a3bbd13c070f..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@@ -686,10 -744,9 +745,10 @@@ static void bnxt_tx_int(struct bnxt *bp
  next_tx_int:
  		cons = NEXT_TX(cons);
  
- 		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ 		dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
  	}
  
 +	bnapi->tx_pkts = 0;
  	WRITE_ONCE(txr->tx_cons, cons);
  
  	__netif_txq_completed_wake(txq, nr_pkts, tx_bytes,
@@@ -2571,11 -2595,12 +2597,11 @@@ static int __bnxt_poll_work(struct bnx
  	return rx_pkts;
  }
  
 -static void __bnxt_poll_work_done(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi)
 +static void __bnxt_poll_work_done(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi,
 +				  int budget)
  {
- 	if (bnapi->tx_pkts)
 -	if (bnapi->tx_pkts && !bnapi->tx_fault) {
 -		bnapi->tx_int(bp, bnapi, bnapi->tx_pkts);
 -		bnapi->tx_pkts = 0;
 -	}
++	if (bnapi->tx_pkts && !bnapi->tx_fault)
 +		bnapi->tx_int(bp, bnapi, budget);
  
  	if ((bnapi->events & BNXT_RX_EVENT) && !(bnapi->in_reset)) {
  		struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr = bnapi->rx_ring;