netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC kspp-next 0/3] compiler_types: add Endianness-dependent __counted_by_{le,be}
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:49:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403181038.EC9DF8CE3C@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318130354.2713265-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:03:51PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>  include/linux/compiler_types.h              | 11 ++++++++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/virtchnl2.h | 24 ++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Oh, I see the Subject says "kspp-next" -- normally I'd expect things
touch net to go through netdev. I'm fine with this going through either
tree. Perhaps better through netdev since that subsystem has the most
users and may gain more using the new macros?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18 13:03 [PATCH RFC kspp-next 0/3] compiler_types: add Endianness-dependent __counted_by_{le,be} Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-18 13:03 ` [PATCH RFC kspp-next 1/3] " Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-18 13:03 ` [PATCH RFC kspp-next 2/3] idpf: make virtchnl2.h self-contained Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-18 13:03 ` [PATCH RFC kspp-next 3/3] idpf: sprinkle __counted_by{,_le}() in the virtchnl2 header Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-19 18:57   ` Simon Horman
2024-03-19 21:42     ` Kees Cook
2024-03-20 10:10       ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-18 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC kspp-next 0/3] compiler_types: add Endianness-dependent __counted_by_{le,be} Kees Cook
2024-03-18 17:49 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-03-19  9:33   ` Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202403181038.EC9DF8CE3C@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).