netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	"Jonathan Lemon" <bsd@fb.com>,
	"Tariq Toukan" <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"Maciej Fijalkowski" <maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/17] AF_XDP infrastructure improvements and mlx5e support
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:01:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2773eabb-68ac-faec-a629-6c2d8b7a1582@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612134805.3bf4ea25@cakuba.netronome.com>

On 2019-06-12 23:48, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:56:33 +0000, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>> UAPI is not changed, XSK RX queues are exposed to the kernel. The lower
>> half of the available amount of RX queues are regular queues, and the
>> upper half are XSK RX queues.
> 
> If I have 32 queues enabled on the NIC

Let's say we have 32 combined channels. In this case RX queues 0..31 are 
regular ones, and 32..63 are XSK-ZC-enabled.

> and I install AF_XDP socket on
> queue 10

It'll trigger the compatibility mode of AF_XDP (without zero copy). You 
should use queue 42, which is in the 32..63 set.

> , does the NIC now have 64 RQs, but only first 32 are in the
> normal RSS map?

Only the regular 0..31 RX queues are part of RSS.

> 
>> The patch "xsk: Extend channels to support combined XSK/non-XSK
>> traffic" was dropped. The final patch was reworked accordingly.
> 
> The final patches has 2k LoC, kind of hard to digest.  You can also
> post the clean up patches separately, no need for large series here.
> 

I used to have the final patch as three patches (add XSK stubs, add RX 
support and add TX support), but I prefer not to have this separation, 
because it doesn't look right to add empty stub functions with /* TODO: 
implement */ comments in one patch and to add the implementations 
immediately in the next patch.

Thanks for reviewing!
Max

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-13 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-12 15:56 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/17] AF_XDP infrastructure improvements and mlx5e support Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/17] net/mlx5e: Attach/detach XDP program safely Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/17] xsk: Add API to check for available entries in FQ Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 12:50   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/17] xsk: Add getsockopt XDP_OPTIONS Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 12:50   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/17] libbpf: Support " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 12:51   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/17] xsk: Change the default frame size to 4096 and allow controlling it Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 20:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-13 14:01     ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 17:29       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-14 13:25         ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-15  1:40           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-18 12:00             ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/17] xsk: Return the whole xdp_desc from xsk_umem_consume_tx Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 12:48   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/17] libbpf: Support drivers with non-combined channels Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 20:23   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-13 12:41     ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-13 17:34       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-13 14:01     ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 14:45       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2019-06-14 13:25         ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-14 17:15           ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2019-06-14 19:50             ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-18 12:00             ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 18:09       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-14 13:25         ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-15  2:12           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/17] net/mlx5e: Replace deprecated PCI_DMA_TODEVICE Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/17] net/mlx5e: Calculate linear RX frag size considering XSK Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/17] net/mlx5e: Allow ICO SQ to be used by multiple RQs Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/17] net/mlx5e: Refactor struct mlx5e_xdp_info Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/17] net/mlx5e: Share the XDP SQ for XDP_TX between RQs Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/17] net/mlx5e: XDP_TX from UMEM support Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/17] net/mlx5e: Consider XSK in XDP MTU limit calculation Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/17] net/mlx5e: Encapsulate open/close queues into a function Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/17] net/mlx5e: Move queue param structs to en/params.h Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 15:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/17] net/mlx5e: Add XSK zero-copy support Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-15 15:42   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-18 12:00     ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-12 19:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/17] AF_XDP infrastructure improvements and mlx5e support Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-12 20:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-13 12:58   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-13 14:01     ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-06-13 14:11       ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-13 14:53         ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-13 14:01   ` Maxim Mikityanskiy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2773eabb-68ac-faec-a629-6c2d8b7a1582@mellanox.com \
    --to=maximmi@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=bsd@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).