Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] tools: bpftool: add delimiters to multi-function JITed dumps

[Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>]

On 05/22/2018 09:55 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 22:46:13 +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
>> +		if (info.nr_jited_func_lens && info.jited_func_lens) {
>> +			struct kernel_sym *sym = NULL;
>> +			unsigned char *img = buf;
>> +			__u64 *ksyms = NULL;
>> +			__u32 *lens;
>> +			__u32 i;
>> +
>> +			if (info.nr_jited_ksyms) {
>> +				kernel_syms_load(&dd);
>> +				ksyms = (__u64 *) info.jited_ksyms;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			lens = (__u32 *) info.jited_func_lens;
>> +			for (i = 0; i < info.nr_jited_func_lens; i++) {
>> +				if (ksyms) {
>> +					sym = kernel_syms_search(&dd, ksyms[i]);
>> +					if (sym)
>> +						printf("%s:\n", sym->name);
>> +					else
>> +						printf("%016llx:\n", ksyms[i]);
>> +				}
>> +
>> +				disasm_print_insn(img, lens[i], opcodes, name);
>> +				img += lens[i];
>> +				printf("\n");
>> +			}
>> +		} else {
> 
> The output doesn't seem to be JSON-compatible :(  We try to make sure
> all bpftool command can produce valid JSON when run with -j (or -p)
> switch.
> 
> Would it be possible to make each function a separate JSON object with
> "name" and "insn" array?  Would that work?

Sandipan, could you take a look at this? Given there's json output today we
should definitely try not to break it; presumably this would be one final
respin of your series with this fixed.

Thanks,
Daniel