netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com,
	roopa@nvidia.com, nikolay@nvidia.com, ssuryaextr@gmail.com,
	mlxsw@nvidia.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 02/10] ipv4: Add a sysctl to control multipath hash fields
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 20:33:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3664a338-40ad-9379-0a4c-ec2bd99681dd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210502162257.3472453-3-idosch@idosch.org>

On 5/2/21 10:22 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> 
> A subsequent patch will add a new multipath hash policy where the packet
> fields used for multipath hash calculation are determined by user space.
> This patch adds a sysctl that allows user space to set these fields.
> 
> The packet fields are represented using a bitmap and are common between
> IPv4 and IPv6 to allow user space to use the same numbering across both
> protocols. For example, to hash based on standard 5-tuple:
> 
>  # sysctl -w net.ipv4.fib_multipath_hash_fields=0-2,4-5
>  net.ipv4.fib_multipath_hash_fields = 0-2,4-5
> 
> More fields can be added in the future, if needed.
> 
> The 'need_outer' and 'need_inner' variables are set in the control path
> to indicate whether dissection of the outer or inner flow is needed.
> They will be used by a subsequent patch to allow the data path to avoid
> dissection of the outer or inner flow when not needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/net/ip_fib.h                   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/net/netns/ipv4.h               |  4 +++
>  net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c                | 24 ++++++++++++++
>  net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> index c2ecc9894fd0..8ab61f4edf02 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> @@ -100,6 +100,35 @@ fib_multipath_hash_policy - INTEGER
>  	- 1 - Layer 4
>  	- 2 - Layer 3 or inner Layer 3 if present
>  
> +fib_multipath_hash_fields - list of comma separated ranges
> +	When fib_multipath_hash_policy is set to 3 (custom multipath hash), the
> +	fields used for multipath hash calculation are determined by this
> +	sysctl.
> +
> +	The format used for both input and output is a comma separated list of
> +	ranges (e.g., "0-2" for source IP, destination IP and IP protocol).
> +	Writing to the file will clear all previous ranges and update the
> +	current list with the input.
> +
> +	Possible fields are:
> +
> +	== ============================
> +	 0 Source IP address
> +	 1 Destination IP address
> +	 2 IP protocol
> +	 3 Unused
> +	 4 Source port
> +	 5 Destination port
> +	 6 Inner source IP address
> +	 7 Inner destination IP address
> +	 8 Inner IP protocol
> +	 9 Inner Flow Label
> +	10 Inner source port
> +	11 Inner destination port
> +	== ============================
> +
> +	Default: 0-2 (source IP, destination IP and IP protocol)

since you are already requiring a name to id conversion, why not just
use a bitmask here as the input? if the value is a 32-bit bitmask do you
need bitmap_zalloc and its overhead?

Also, you could implement the current default using this scheme since
you have the default fields as the current L3 policy.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-02 16:22 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/10] Add support for custom multipath hash Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/10] ipv4: Calculate multipath hash inside switch statement Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/10] ipv4: Add a sysctl to control multipath hash fields Ido Schimmel
2021-05-04  2:33   ` David Ahern [this message]
2021-05-05  7:48     ` Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/10] ipv4: Add custom multipath hash policy Ido Schimmel
2021-05-04  2:38   ` David Ahern
2021-05-04  2:40     ` David Ahern
2021-05-05  8:45       ` Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/10] ipv6: Use a more suitable label name Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/10] ipv6: Calculate multipath hash inside switch statement Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/10] ipv6: Add a sysctl to control multipath hash fields Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/10] ipv6: Add custom multipath hash policy Ido Schimmel
2021-05-04  2:46   ` David Ahern
2021-05-05  8:50     ` Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/10] selftests: forwarding: Add test for custom multipath hash Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/10] selftests: forwarding: Add test for custom multipath hash with IPv4 GRE Ido Schimmel
2021-05-02 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/10] selftests: forwarding: Add test for custom multipath hash with IPv6 GRE Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3664a338-40ad-9379-0a4c-ec2bd99681dd@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ssuryaextr@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).