From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14309C433E0 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D899C206BE for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=walle.cc header.i=@walle.cc header.b="igFGtRzt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404688AbgFYMhs (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:37:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404285AbgFYMhr (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:37:47 -0400 Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (ssl.serverraum.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:151:8464::1:2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1D0C061573; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 05:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (web.serverraum.org [172.16.0.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.serverraum.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7634E22F99; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:37:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2016061301; t=1593088663; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Kko6KPRJbrrxd/OzuO+4kiTUvVjfUZwSZ/cLISnq5wo=; b=igFGtRzt+YksWixMjHX1+e8P0eA9n7wLET+6ciylTzLs3QGHj5aRji1JuSOwVs6PvKmZZD dEmE22dfVtJnA6swBgnijO9RgDvaj2jz5oCIIQpGnq/yreoGsxDBLQ9yL3oypYVDDIAl5M yfJQ3pH2ZlTgDxirtpZlZnHCb5xZZhw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:37:43 +0200 From: Michael Walle To: Joakim Zhang , mkl@pengutronix.de Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, dl-linux-imx , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-can-next/flexcan] can: flexcan: fix TDC feature In-Reply-To: References: <20200416093126.15242-1-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com> <20200416093126.15242-2-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.5 Message-ID: <39b5d77bda519c4d836f44a554890bae@walle.cc> X-Sender: michael@walle.cc Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Am 2020-06-02 12:15, schrieb Michael Walle: > Hi Marc, > > Am 2020-04-16 11:41, schrieb Joakim Zhang: >> Hi Marc, >> >> How about FlexCAN FD patch set, it is pending for a long time. Many >> work would base on it, we are happy to see it in upstream mainline >> ASAP. >> >> Michael Walle also gives out the test-by tag: >> Tested-by: Michael Walle > > There seems to be no activity for months here. Any reason for that? Is > there anything we can do to speed things up? ping.. There are no replies or anything. Sorry but this is really annoying and frustrating. Marc, is there anything wrong with the flexcan patches? -michael