[PATCH bpf v2] bpf, lpm: fix lookup bug in map_delete_elem

* [PATCH bpf v2] bpf, lpm: fix lookup bug in map_delete_elem
@ 2019-02-22 13:19 Alban Crequy
  2019-02-22 13:38 ` Alban Crequy
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alban Crequy @ 2019-02-22 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel; +Cc: kafai, netdev, linux-kernel, alban, iago

From: Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>

trie_delete_elem() was deleting an entry even though it was not matching
if the prefixlen was correct. This patch adds a check on matchlen.

Reproducer:

$ sudo bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm type lpm_trie key 8 value 1 entries 128 name mylpm flags 1
$ sudo bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key hex 10 00 00 00 aa bb cc dd value hex 01
$ sudo bpftool map dump pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm
key: 10 00 00 00 aa bb cc dd  value: 01
Found 1 element
$ sudo bpftool map delete pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key hex 10 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff
$ echo $?
0
$ sudo bpftool map dump pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm
Found 0 elements

A similar reproducer is added in the selftests.

Without the patch:

$ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map
test_lpm_map: test_lpm_map.c:485: test_lpm_delete: Assertion `bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && errno == ENOENT' failed.
Aborted

With the patch: test_lpm_map runs without errors.

Fixes: e454cf595853 ("bpf: Implement map_delete_elem for BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE")
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>

---

Changes v1 to v2:
- add selftest (review from Martin)
- update commitmsg tags (review from Martin)
- rebase on "bpf" tree and test again (review from Martin)
---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c                      |  1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index abf1002080df..93a5cbbde421 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ static int trie_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key)
 	}
 
 	if (!node || node->prefixlen != key->prefixlen ||
+	    node->prefixlen != matchlen ||
 	    (node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) {
 		ret = -ENOENT;
 		goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
index 147e34cfceb7..02d7c871862a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -474,6 +474,16 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void)
 	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 &&
 		errno == ENOENT);
 
+	key->prefixlen = 30; // unused prefix so far
+	inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data);
+	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 &&
+		errno == ENOENT);
+
+	key->prefixlen = 16; // same prefix as the root node
+	inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data);
+	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 &&
+		errno == ENOENT);
+
 	/* assert initial lookup */
 	key->prefixlen = 32;
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", key->data);
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread