From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksandr Natalenko Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] tcp/ipv4: kernel panic because of (possible) division by zero Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:57:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4496498.SgxPQx9et6@spock> References: <26396443.iDTTxgChSj@spock> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Yuchung Cheng , netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Patrick McHardy , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , James Morris , Alexey Kuznetsov , "David S. Miller" To: Neal Cardwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Yes, this is my next step. Then I'll try to move from YeAH. On =D0=BD=D0=B5=D0=B4=D1=96=D0=BB=D1=8F, 10 =D1=81=D1=96=D1=87=D0=BD=D1= =8F 2016 =D1=80. 09:54:16 EET Neal Cardwell wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Neal Cardwell = wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko > >=20 > > wrote: > >> With the patch queued for upstream and ECN enabled I get WARN_ON_O= NCE() > >> triggered. Here is the stacktrace: > >>=20 > >> https://gist.github.com/89203e77bfcb051f269a > >>=20 > >> It seems that tp->prior_cwnd is zero. > >=20 > > Hmm. Interesting. Can you please confirm that you are using the cub= ic > > congestion control module? >=20 > Would you be able to do an experiment where you reboot, and then > disable ECN upon startup, and then see if the warning still shows up > without ECN? >=20 > thanks, > neal