From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tariq Toukan" <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
"David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Joe Stringer" <joe@cilium.io>,
"Florent Revest" <revest@chromium.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/5] New BPF helpers to accelerate synproxy
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 20:17:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48df5a60-f6e2-de05-1413-4511825511a5@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13051d07-babc-1991-104b-f4969ac24b9b@nvidia.com>
On 2022-05-11 14:48, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> On 2022-05-11 02:59, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:21 PM Maxim Mikityanskiy
>> <maximmi@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2022-05-07 00:51, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is it expected that your selftests will fail on s390x? Please check [0]
>>>
>>> I see it fails with:
>>>
>>> test_synproxy:FAIL:ethtool -K tmp0 tx off unexpected error: 32512
>>> (errno 2)
>>>
>>> errno 2 is ENOENT, probably the ethtool binary is missing from the s390x
>>> image? When reviewing v6, you said you added ethtool to the CI image.
>>> Maybe it was added to x86_64 only? Could you add it to s390x?
>>>
>>
>> Could be that it was outdated in s390x, but with [0] just merged in it
>> should have pretty recent one.
>
> Do you mean the image was outdated and didn't contain ethtool? Or
> ethtool was in the image, but was outdated? If the latter, I would
> expect it to work, this specific ethtool command has worked for ages.
Hi Andrii,
Could you reply this question? I need to understand whether I need to
make any changes to the CI before resubmitting.
Thanks,
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-03 17:14 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/5] New BPF helpers to accelerate synproxy Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-03 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/5] bpf: Fix documentation of th_len in bpf_tcp_{gen,check}_syncookie Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-03 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/5] bpf: Allow helpers to accept pointers with a fixed size Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-06 21:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-03 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/5] bpf: Add helpers to issue and check SYN cookies in XDP Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-06 21:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 19:20 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-11 0:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-03 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/5] bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-06 21:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 19:21 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-11 0:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11 11:48 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-03 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/5] bpf: Allow the new syncookie helpers to work with SKBs Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-06 21:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-06 21:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/5] New BPF helpers to accelerate synproxy Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 19:21 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-10 23:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11 11:48 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-16 17:17 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy [this message]
2022-05-18 13:43 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-05-19 4:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48df5a60-f6e2-de05-1413-4511825511a5@nvidia.com \
--to=maximmi@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).