netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 problem on 486.
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 00:30:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49f40dd8-da68-f579-b359-7a7e229565e1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60B560A8.8000800@gmail.com>

On 01.06.2021 00:18, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Some more results follow. I'll report on all suggestions here in one go for brevity.
> 
>> One possible issue is that the "RTL_W16 (IntrStatus, TxErr)" can
>> leak out of the spinlock unless it is changed to RTL_W16_F(), but
>> I don't see how that would cause your problem. This is probably
>> not the issue here, but it can't hurt to change that. Similarly,
>> the "RTL_W16 (IntrStatus, ackstat)" would need the same _F
>> to ensure that a  normal TX-only interrupt gets acked before the
>> spinlock.
> 
> Just tested with "_F" added to all of them, did not help.
> 
>> Another observation I have is that the loop used to be around
>> "RTL_R16(IntrStatus); rtl8139_rx(); rtl8139_tx_interrupt()", so
>> removing the loop also means that the tx handler is only called
>> once when it used to be called for every loop iteration.
>> If this is what triggers the problem, you should be able to break
>> it the same way by moving the rtl8139_tx_interrupt() ahead of the
>> loop, and adjusting the RTL_W16 (IntrStatus, ackstat) accordingly
>> so you only Ack the TX before calling rtl8139_tx_interrupt().
> 
> I get the idea in general, but not sure how exactly you proposed to move rtl8139_tx_interrupt() and adjust the RTL_W16 (IntrStatus, ackstat).
> But meanwhile, I tried a dumb thing instead, and it worked!
> I've put back The Loop:
> ---------------------------
> +       int boguscnt = 20;
> 
>         spin_lock (&tp->lock);
> +       do {
>         status = RTL_R16 (IntrStatus);
> 
>         /* shared irq? */
> @@ -2181,6 +2183,8 @@
>                 if (status & TxErr)
>                         RTL_W16 (IntrStatus, TxErr);
>         }
> +       boguscnt--;
> +       } while (boguscnt > 0);
>   out:
> ---------------------------
> With this added, connection works fine again. Of course it is silly, but hopefully it gives a path for a real fix.
> 

What was discussed here 16 yrs ago should sound familiar to you.
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg92234.html
"It was an option in my BIOS PCI level/edge settings as I posted."
You could check whether you have same/similar option in your BIOS
and play with it.


>> What's your qdisc? Recently there was a bug related to the lockless
>> pfifo_fast qdisc
> 
> If I understand correctly this means packet scheduler type. In more recent kernels I typically have CONFIG_DEFAULT_NET_SCH="fq_codel", now in 2.6.3 no explicite scheduler is enabled, so it must be some fast fifo. But as the sympthoms were basically identical in e.g. 2.6.3 and 4.14, I suppose it is unlikely to be the cause.
> 
>> Issue could be related to rx and tx processing now potentially running in parallel.
>> I only have access to the current 8139too source code, hopefully the following
>> works on the old version:
>>
>> In the end of rtl8139_start_xmit() there's
>> if ((tp->cur_tx - NUM_TX_DESC) == tp->dirty_tx)
>>         netif_stop_queue (dev);
>>
>> Try changing this to
> 
> Ok, the changes compiled fine, but unfortunately made no noticable difference.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Regards,
> Nikolai
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-31 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-29 14:08 Realtek 8139 problem on 486 Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-29 18:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-29 21:44   ` tedheadster
2021-05-30  0:49     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 10:36       ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 17:27         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 20:54           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-30 23:17             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 16:53               ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 18:39                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-31 22:18                   ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 22:30                     ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2021-06-01  7:20                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-01 10:53                         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-01 11:42                           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 16:09                             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-01 21:48                               ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 23:37                                 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-02  9:12                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 23:07                                     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-08  7:44                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 20:32                                         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-08 20:45                                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 22:07                                             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-09  7:09                                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-12 17:40                                                 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-12 22:41                                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-13 14:10                                                     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-13 21:52                                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-03 18:32                                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-04  7:36                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-20  0:34                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-20 10:19                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21  4:10                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-21 11:22                                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21 14:42                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-21 15:20                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-22 11:12                                             ` David Laight
2021-06-22 12:42                                           ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-22 13:22                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-22 18:42                                               ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-22 19:26                                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-23  1:04                                                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-24 17:56                                                     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-24 18:25                                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-14 23:32                                                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-15  7:32                                                           ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-16 23:48                                                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-23 16:31                                                   ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-23 23:39                                                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-24  8:28                                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-02 19:02                                                         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-03  9:10                                                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-08 19:21                                                             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-09  7:31                                                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-09 12:43                                                               ` David Laight
2021-06-01 17:44                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-02 15:14                               ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-02 15:28                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-31 19:05                 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-31 18:29 ` Denis Kirjanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49f40dd8-da68-f579-b359-7a7e229565e1@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhubr.2@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).