From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: minor update to Documentation/networking/scaling.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:56:54 -0700
Message-ID: <4E494FD6.6090400@hp.com>
References: <1312899648.5889.14.camel@gopher.nyc.corp.google.com> <4E418030.2010102@hp.com> <4E44752D.1080905@google.com> <4E4476CC.5050900@google.com> <4E45B810.3000501@hp.com> <CA+FuTScsrN5=NLeHgyNP+TXL+_auU6p80Lb5JUaMb_o5aGGqww@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com
To: Will de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTScsrN5=NLeHgyNP+TXL+_auU6p80Lb5JUaMb_o5aGGqww@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 08/15/2011 09:11 AM, Will de Bruijn wrote:
>> I'd suggest simply "share a particular level in the memory hierarchy (Cache,
>> NUMA node, etc)"  and that way you get away from people asking nitpicky
>> questions about where cache hierarchy counting starts, and at what level
>> caches might be shared :)
>>
>> Apart from that, looks fine.
>
> Thanks. It is already applied, so if you don't feel strongly about
> this, I'll leave it as is (and take any nitpicky flak if that comes ;)

Sounds like a plan.

rick