* VLAN Question
@ 2011-10-29 13:35 Roya Kachooei
2011-10-29 15:51 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roya Kachooei @ 2011-10-29 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hi there
My question is that is it possible to bond or aggregate two virtual
interfaces created by VLAN?
In other words is it possible to bond two virtual links for improving
fail over and load balance?
Best Regards,
Roya Kachooei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: VLAN Question
2011-10-29 13:35 VLAN Question Roya Kachooei
@ 2011-10-29 15:51 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan @ 2011-10-29 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roya Kachooei; +Cc: netdev
Le 29/10/2011 15:35, Roya Kachooei a écrit :
> Hi there
>
>
> My question is that is it possible to bond or aggregate two virtual
> interfaces created by VLAN?
>
> In other words is it possible to bond two virtual links for improving
> fail over and load balance?
If both virtual links are supported by the same physical link, nothing will improve.
That being said, some people used VLAN to provide end-to-end links, across one or several common
switches.
+-eth0-----vlan-100-----eth0-+
| |
bond0-+ +-bond0
| |
+-eth1-----vlan-200-----eth1-+
Nicolas.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-29 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-29 13:35 VLAN Question Roya Kachooei
2011-10-29 15:51 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).