From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 15:06:53 +0530 Message-ID: <4FA251B5.8080109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120503.025951.1393913795357644010.davem@davemloft.net> <4FA24AB1.9010108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120503.053246.92708809581536438.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpoirier@suse.de, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, stephen.s.ko@intel.com To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120503.053246.92708809581536438.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 05/03/2012 03:02 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" > Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:36:57 +0530 > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/197 > > Networking patches not posted to netdev and the Intel ethernet driver > maintainers will be ignored. > Jeff Kirsher (Intel ethernet driver maintainer) already acked that patchset (both patches). https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/376 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/377 One went upstream, the other didn't (yet). That's my concern. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat