From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@ixiacom.com>,
Alexandru Copot <alex.mihai.c@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Lucian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] inet: add second hash table
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:27:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC64A74.8000308@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338381662.2760.172.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 05/30/2012 05:41 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 15:32 +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> UDP case was a bit different, since production machine could really have
> thousand of UDP flows for tunnel terminations.
>
> But for TCP, unless your very specific needs I don't see the real need
> to review 400 lines of patches ?
>
> Nobody but you ever complained of listen() being performance critical
> with 16.000 IP on a machime...
Well, we do similar things and would probably benefit from this change...
If it would help, I'll add these to our kernels and run them through
some of our test cases..but will probably be a week or two at soonest...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 7:36 [RFC PATCH 0/4] inet: add second hash table Alexandru Copot
2012-05-30 7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] inet: add counter to inet_bind_hashbucket Alexandru Copot
2012-05-30 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-30 7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] inet: add a second bind hash Alexandru Copot
2012-05-30 7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] inet: add/remove inet buckets in the " Alexandru Copot
2012-05-30 7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] inet: use second hash in inet_csk_get_port Alexandru Copot
2012-05-30 16:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-30 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-30 19:11 ` Alexandru Copot
2012-05-30 7:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] inet: add second hash table Eric Dumazet
2012-05-30 12:32 ` Daniel Baluta
2012-05-30 12:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-30 16:27 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC64A74.8000308@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=alex.mihai.c@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dbaluta@ixiacom.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=lucian.grijincu@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).