From: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
To: "Jiang Wang ." <jiang.wang@bytedance.com>
Cc: "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"cong.wang@bytedance.com" <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
"duanxiongchun@bytedance.com" <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>,
"xieyongji@bytedance.com" <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] [RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:02:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE66B72-E16B-474D-9A17-70B3BCCD5A19@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP_N_Z-KFUYZc7p1z_-9nb9CvjtyGFkgkX1PEbh-SgKbX_snQw@mail.gmail.com>
> On 7 Apr 2021, at 20:25, Jiang Wang . <jiang.wang@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:51 AM Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 6 Apr 2021, at 20:31, Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: "jiang.wang" <jiang.wang@bytedance.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, only VMCI supports dgram sockets. To supported
>>> nested VM use case, this patch removes transport_dgram and
>>> uses transport_g2h and transport_h2g for dgram too.
>>
>> Could you provide some background for introducing this change - are you
>> looking at introducing datagrams for a different transport? VMCI datagrams
>> already support the nested use case,
>
> Yes, I am trying to introduce datagram for virtio transport. I wrote a
> spec patch for
> virtio dgram support and also a code patch, but the code patch is still WIP.
Oh ok. Cool. I must have missed the spec patch - could you provide a reference to
it?
> When I wrote this commit message, I was thinking nested VM is the same as
> multiple transport support. But now, I realize they are different.
> Nested VMs may use
> the same virtualization layer(KVM on KVM), or different virtualization layers
> (KVM on ESXi). Thanks for letting me know that VMCI already supported nested
> use cases. I think you mean VMCI on VMCI, right?
Right, only VMCI on VMCI.
I’ll respond to Stefano’s email for the rest of the discussion.
Thanks,
Jorgen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 18:31 [RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram Jiang Wang
2021-04-07 9:51 ` Jorgen Hansen
2021-04-07 18:25 ` [External] " Jiang Wang .
2021-04-12 14:04 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-04-12 18:53 ` Jiang Wang .
[not found] ` <2EE65DBC-30AC-4E11-BFD5-73586B94C985@vmware.com>
2021-04-13 12:52 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-04-13 22:41 ` Jiang Wang .
2021-04-13 9:02 ` Jorgen Hansen [this message]
2021-04-13 22:32 ` Jiang Wang .
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE66B72-E16B-474D-9A17-70B3BCCD5A19@vmware.com \
--to=jhansen@vmware.com \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=jiang.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nslusarek@gmx.net \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).