netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	Mark.Rutland@arm.com, Will.Deacon@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve.Capper@arm.com,
	Kaly.Xin@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent.
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:09:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c6038f5-1da4-0b43-d8b7-541379321bf1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190829063952.18470-3-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 29/08/2019 07:39, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, ptp_kvm modules implementation is only for x86 which includs
> large part of arch-specific code.  This patch move all of those code
> into related arch directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/arch_ptp_kvm.c          | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                 |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => kvm_ptp.c} | 77 ++++++-----------------
>  include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h        | 12 ++++
>  4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/arch_ptp_kvm.c
>  rename drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => kvm_ptp.c} (63%)
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/arch_ptp_kvm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/arch_ptp_kvm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..56ea84a86da2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/arch_ptp_kvm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
> + *  All Rights Reserved

No. This isn't ARM's code, not by a million mile. You've simply
refactored existing code. Please keep the correct attribution (i.e. that
of the original code).

> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/pvclock.h>
> +#include <asm/kvmclock.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <uapi/asm/kvm_para.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/kvm_para.h>
> +#include <linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h>
> +
> +phys_addr_t clock_pair_gpa;
> +struct kvm_clock_pairing clock_pair;
> +struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *hv_clock;
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_para_available())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	clock_pair_gpa = slow_virt_to_phys(&clock_pair);
> +	hv_clock = pvclock_get_pvti_cpu0_va();
> +	if (!hv_clock)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING, clock_pair_gpa,
> +			     KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK);
> +	if (ret == -KVM_ENOSYS || ret == -KVM_EOPNOTSUPP)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +{
> +	long ret;
> +
> +	ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING,
> +			     clock_pair_gpa,
> +			     KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK);
> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ts->tv_sec = clock_pair.sec;
> +	ts->tv_nsec = clock_pair.nsec;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock_fn(long *cycle, struct timespec64 *tspec,
> +			      struct clocksource **cs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ret;
> +	unsigned int version;
> +	int cpu;
> +	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src;
> +
> +	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	src = &hv_clock[cpu].pvti;
> +
> +	do {
> +		/*
> +		 * We are using a TSC value read in the hosts
> +		 * kvm_hc_clock_pairing handling.
> +		 * So any changes to tsc_to_system_mul
> +		 * and tsc_shift or any other pvclock
> +		 * data invalidate that measurement.
> +		 */
> +		version = pvclock_read_begin(src);
> +
> +		ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING,
> +				     clock_pair_gpa,
> +				     KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK);
> +		tspec->tv_sec = clock_pair.sec;
> +		tspec->tv_nsec = clock_pair.nsec;
> +		*cycle = __pvclock_read_cycles(src, clock_pair.tsc);
> +	} while (pvclock_read_retry(src, version));
> +
> +	*cs = &kvm_clock;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PTP clock using KVMCLOCK");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Makefile b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> index 677d1d178a3e..5a8c6462fc0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  #
>  
>  ptp-y					:= ptp_clock.o ptp_chardev.o ptp_sysfs.o
> +ptp_kvm-y				:= ../../arch/$(ARCH)/kvm/arch_ptp_kvm.o kvm_ptp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK)		+= ptp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_DTE)	+= ptp_dte.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_IXP46X)	+= ptp_ixp46x.o
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm.c b/drivers/ptp/kvm_ptp.c
> similarity index 63%
> rename from drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm.c
> rename to drivers/ptp/kvm_ptp.c
> index fc7d0b77e118..9d07cf872be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/kvm_ptp.c
> @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <uapi/linux/kvm_para.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_para.h>
> -#include <asm/pvclock.h>
> -#include <asm/kvmclock.h>
>  #include <uapi/asm/kvm_para.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h>
>  
> @@ -24,56 +24,29 @@ struct kvm_ptp_clock {
>  
>  DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kvm_ptp_lock);
>  
> -static struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *hv_clock;
> -
> -static struct kvm_clock_pairing clock_pair;
> -static phys_addr_t clock_pair_gpa;
> -
>  static int ptp_kvm_get_time_fn(ktime_t *device_time,
>  			       struct system_counterval_t *system_counter,
>  			       void *ctx)
>  {
> -	unsigned long ret;
> +	unsigned long ret, cycle;
>  	struct timespec64 tspec;
> -	unsigned version;
> -	int cpu;
> -	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src;
> +	struct clocksource *cs;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
>  
>  	preempt_disable_notrace();
> -	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -	src = &hv_clock[cpu].pvti;
> -
> -	do {
> -		/*
> -		 * We are using a TSC value read in the hosts
> -		 * kvm_hc_clock_pairing handling.
> -		 * So any changes to tsc_to_system_mul
> -		 * and tsc_shift or any other pvclock
> -		 * data invalidate that measurement.
> -		 */
> -		version = pvclock_read_begin(src);
> -
> -		ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING,
> -				     clock_pair_gpa,
> -				     KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK);
> -		if (ret != 0) {
> -			pr_err_ratelimited("clock pairing hypercall ret %lu\n", ret);
> -			spin_unlock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
> -			preempt_enable_notrace();
> -			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -		}
> -
> -		tspec.tv_sec = clock_pair.sec;
> -		tspec.tv_nsec = clock_pair.nsec;
> -		ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(src, clock_pair.tsc);
> -	} while (pvclock_read_retry(src, version));
> +	ret = kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock_fn(&cycle, &tspec, &cs);
> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		pr_err_ratelimited("clock pairing hypercall ret %lu\n", ret);
> +		spin_unlock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
> +		preempt_enable_notrace();
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
>  
>  	preempt_enable_notrace();
>  
> -	system_counter->cycles = ret;
> -	system_counter->cs = &kvm_clock;
> +	system_counter->cycles = cycle;
> +	system_counter->cs = cs;
>  
>  	*device_time = timespec64_to_ktime(tspec);
>  
> @@ -116,17 +89,13 @@ static int ptp_kvm_gettime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct timespec64 *ts)
>  
>  	spin_lock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
>  
> -	ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING,
> -			     clock_pair_gpa,
> -			     KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK);
> +	ret = kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(&tspec);
>  	if (ret != 0) {
>  		pr_err_ratelimited("clock offset hypercall ret %lu\n", ret);
>  		spin_unlock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}
>  
> -	tspec.tv_sec = clock_pair.sec;
> -	tspec.tv_nsec = clock_pair.nsec;
>  	spin_unlock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
>  
>  	memcpy(ts, &tspec, sizeof(struct timespec64));
> @@ -166,21 +135,11 @@ static void __exit ptp_kvm_exit(void)
>  
>  static int __init ptp_kvm_init(void)
>  {
> -	long ret;
> -
> -	if (!kvm_para_available())
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	clock_pair_gpa = slow_virt_to_phys(&clock_pair);
> -	hv_clock = pvclock_get_pvti_cpu0_va();
> -
> -	if (!hv_clock)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING, clock_pair_gpa,
> -			KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK);
> -	if (ret == -KVM_ENOSYS || ret == -KVM_EOPNOTSUPP)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	ret = kvm_arch_ptp_init();
> +	if (IS_ERR(ret))
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	kvm_ptp_clock.caps = ptp_kvm_caps;
>  
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..128a9d7af161
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
> + *  All Rights Reserved

Same here.

> + */
> +
> +static int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void);
> +static int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts);
> +static int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock_fn(long *cycle,
> +		struct timespec64 *tspec, void *cs);
> 

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29  6:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: enable virtual kvm ptp for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2019-08-29  6:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Export psci_ops.conduit symbol as modules will use it Jianyong Wu
2019-08-29  6:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent Jianyong Wu
2019-08-29  9:09   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-08-29  9:56     ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-29  6:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2019-08-29 10:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-06 11:58     ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-07  9:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-09 10:17         ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-09 11:24           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-10 10:29             ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-11 10:06               ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-11 11:30                 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-12  9:40                   ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c6038f5-1da4-0b43-d8b7-541379321bf1@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).