From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fan Du Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: split rt_genid for ipv4 and ipv6 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:33:57 +0800 Message-ID: <51F9ACF5.6080807@windriver.com> References: <1375144433-731-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com> <20130730070702.GG2490@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130731.145710.1507535169314670977.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , , , , , , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:47088 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752968Ab3HAAcU (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:32:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130731.145710.1507535169314670977.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8801=E6=97=A5 05:57, David Miller wrote: > From: Hannes Frederic Sowa > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:07:02 +0200 > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:33:53AM +0800, Fan Du wrote: >>> Current net name space has only one genid for both IPv4 and IPv6, i= t has below >>> drawbacks: >>> >>> - Add/delete an IPv4 address will invalidate all IPv6 routing table= entries. >>> - Insert/remove XFRM policy will also invalidate both IPv4/IPv6 rou= ting table >>> entries even when the policy is only applied for one address fam= ily. >>> >>> Thus, this patch attempt to split one genid for two to cater for IP= v4 and IPv6 >>> separately in a fine granularity. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du >> >> Also this patch only applies with some fuzz, it addressed all my iss= ues: >> >> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa > > Applied, thanks. > Thanks Dave, Hannes, Steffen and Nicolas for reviewing this patch! --=20 =E6=B5=AE=E6=B2=89=E9=9A=8F=E6=B5=AA=E5=8F=AA=E8=AE=B0=E4=BB=8A=E6=9C=9D= =E7=AC=91 --fan