From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] sfc: add support for skb->xmit_more Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:42:38 +0100 Message-ID: <543FE76E.5080309@solarflare.com> References: <20141014.171501.448630399243434370.davem@davemloft.net> <543E54FF.1040304@solarflare.com> <20141015.122034.126232757997381022.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com ([209.65.160.86]:22367 "EHLO nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751073AbaJPPvk (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:51:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20141015.122034.126232757997381022.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15/10/14 17:20, David Miller wrote: > From: Edward Cree > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:05:35 +0100 > >> On 14/10/14 22:15, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Edward Cree >>> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:41:37 +0100 >>> >>>> Don't ring the doorbell, and don't do PIO. This will also prevent >>>> TX Push, because there will be more than one buffer waiting when >>>> the doorbell is rung. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree >>> This looks good to me, mind if I apply this now? >> I'd rather wait until Jon Cooper's had a chance to look at it; he >> understands our TX path better than I. > Ok. Looks good to me. Acked-by: Jon Cooper