From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: sched: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree" Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:00:14 +0100 Message-ID: <546CCC9E.7090905@redhat.com> References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.so urceforge.net> <546BAB93.4010406@users.sourceforge.net> <546CC9B3.5060405@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: SF Markus Elfring , "David S. Miller" , Jamal Hadi Salim , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle To: John Fastabend Return-path: In-Reply-To: <546CC9B3.5060405@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 11/19/2014 05:47 PM, John Fastabend wrote: > On 11/18/2014 12:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> From: Markus Elfring ... >> if (fp_old) >> bpf_prog_destroy(fp_old); >> - if (bpf_old) >> - kfree(bpf_old); >> + kfree(bpf_old); >> >> return 0; >> > > Maybe I need some coffee but I can't figure out what this > patch is against... > > # grep bpf_old ./net/sched/cls_bpf.c > # Coffee is always good. :) Yeah, you actually removed this in commit 1f947bf151e90ec ("net: sched: rcu'ify cls_bpf"), so looks like Markus's tree is not up to date ...