Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: prohibit ACPI power management for brcmfmac driver

["Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>]

On 2015/5/7 16:30, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/07/15 04:07, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any comments are welcome.
>
> Having some time to spare while spending my vacation so here it is.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhonghui
>>
>> On 2015/5/3 23:26, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>> ACPI will manage WiFi chip's power state during suspend/resume
>>> process on some tablet platforms(such as ASUS T100TA). This is
>>> not supported by brcmfmac driver now, and the context of WiFi
>>> chip will be damaged after resume. This patch informs ACPI not
>>> to manage WiFi chip's power state.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Another implementation.
>>>
>>>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c |    8 ++++++++
>>>   1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> index 9b508bd..6c519e3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>>>   #include<linux/suspend.h>
>>>   #include<linux/errno.h>
>>>   #include<linux/module.h>
>>> +#include<linux/acpi.h>
>>>   #include<net/cfg80211.h>
>>>
>>>   #include<defs.h>
>>> @@ -1114,6 +1115,8 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
>>>       int err;
>>>       struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev;
>>>       struct brcmf_bus *bus_if;
>>> +    struct device *dev;
>>> +    struct acpi_device *adev;
>>>
>>>       brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter\n");
>>>       brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Class=%x\n", func->class);
>>> @@ -1121,6 +1124,11 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
>>>       brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "sdio device ID: 0x%04x\n", func->device);
>>>       brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Function#: %d\n", func->num);
>>>
>>> +    /* prohibit ACPI power management for this device */
>>> +    dev =&func->dev;
>>> +    if (adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev))
>
> While I understand what you are doing here it makes someone reading the code wonder whether a mistake has been made. So I would prefer to have the assignment separate for the if statement.
>
> For the update patch you may add:
>
> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Many thanks for your comments. I have sent out the v3 patch.


Thanks,
Zhonghui
>
> Regards,
> Arend
>>> +        adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
>>> +
>>>       /* Consume func num 1 but dont do anything with it. */
>>>       if (func->num == 1)
>>>           return 0;
>>> -- 1.7.1
>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html