From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 5/7] i40e: Consolidate checks whether given VSI is main
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557e819bc6acdfc2311fe2254b1f382bad8368fc.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318143058.287014-6-ivecera@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 15:30 +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> In the driver code there are 3 types of checks whether given
> VSI is main or not:
> 1. vsi->type ==/!= I40E_VSI_MAIN
> 2. vsi ==/!= pf->vsi[pf->lan_vsi]
> 3. vsi->seid ==/!= pf->vsi[pf->lan_vsi]->seid
>
> All of them are equivalent and can be consolidated. Convert cases
> 2 and 3 to case 1.
Minor nit: while at it, what about introducing an helper for such
check?
Reordering the patches you could use it also in i40e_pf_get_main_vsi()
Cheers,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 14:30 [PATCH iwl-next 0/7] i40e: cleanups & refactors Ivan Vecera
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 1/7] i40e: Remove flags field from i40e_veb Ivan Vecera
2024-03-26 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2024-03-26 15:50 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 2/7] i40e: Change argument of several client notification functions Ivan Vecera
2024-03-26 16:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 3/7] i40e: Change argument of i40e_detect_recover_hung() Ivan Vecera
2024-03-26 17:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 4/7] i40e: Add helper to access main VSI Ivan Vecera
2024-03-27 10:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 5/7] i40e: Consolidate checks whether given VSI is main Ivan Vecera
2024-03-19 10:17 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-03-21 9:33 ` Ivan Vecera
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 6/7] i40e: Add helper to access main VEB Ivan Vecera
2024-03-26 20:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2024-03-18 14:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next 7/7] i40e: Add and use helper to reconfigure TC for given VSI Ivan Vecera
2024-03-19 9:54 ` [PATCH iwl-next 0/7] i40e: cleanups & refactors Michal Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557e819bc6acdfc2311fe2254b1f382bad8368fc.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).