From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: net-next is OPEN Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:48:36 +0300 Message-ID: <559EB3F4.3060000@cogentembedded.com> References: <20150708.133041.2042093870138764891.davem@davemloft.net> <559E5FCE.6010301@cogentembedded.com> <20150709.104019.370940061164391476.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:35736 "EHLO mail-lb0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751885AbbGIRsl (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:48:41 -0400 Received: by lblf12 with SMTP id f12so9886703lbl.2 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150709.104019.370940061164391476.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/09/2015 08:40 PM, David Miller wrote: >>> Please feel free to bombard me with net-next changes, which some of >>> you have been doing already ;-(, as net-next is now open. >> Hm, I pulled and didn't see 4.2-rc1 tag. Is it normal? > Why does it have to be there? I thought your pause during the merge window is caused by you wanting for -rc1 tagging in order for the possible conflicts to be resolved... > I build net-next by pulling net into net-next. Well, that merge you do quite routinely. :-) > Since 'net' is based upon Linus's tree before he added that tag > there is no reason for it to have that tag at all. > I really have no idea why you expect it to be there. I then don't quite understand why you close net-next during the merge window and beyond. WBR, Sergei