From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: roopa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] route: allow to route in a peer netns via lwt framework Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 06:50:09 -0700 Message-ID: <55B24291.1040704@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <1437661349-17620-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <55B101DC.6040609@cumulusnetworks.com> <55B1077F.1090501@6wind.com> <55B10D50.9010704@cumulusnetworks.com> <55B22E64.2010405@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tgraf@suug.ch To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:34563 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752552AbbGXNuN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:50:13 -0400 Received: by pacan13 with SMTP id an13so15126573pac.1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 06:50:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55B22E64.2010405@6wind.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 7/24/15, 5:24 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Sure, but my goal was to not create a new .h file just for these two > helpers. > It's related to lwtunnel, thus I was thinking they can go here. ok..., since your lwt namespace functions went into net_namespace.c, I was thinking these should really go into net_namespace.h. Does that work for you ? If that does not, then yes, they could live here. Thanks, Roopa