From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikolay Aleksandrov Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix feature changes on devices without ndo_set_features Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:10:07 +0100 Message-ID: <564BB3CF.2080507@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <5645C0A5.2080506@cumulusnetworks.com> <1447422841-2333-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org> <564BB22C.2000606@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Jarod Wilson , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Sander Eikelenboom , Andy Gospodarek , Florian Fainelli To: Sergei Shtylyov , Nikolay Aleksandrov , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:35514 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755087AbbKQXKK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:10:10 -0500 Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so176293178wmd.0 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:10:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <564BB22C.2000606@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/18/2015 12:03 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 11/13/2015 04:54 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > >> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov >> >> When __netdev_update_features() was updated to ensure some features are >> disabled on new lower devices, an error was introduced for devices which >> don't have the ndo_set_features() method set. Before we'll just set the >> new features, but now we return an error and don't set them. Fix this by >> returning the old behaviour and setting err to 0 when ndo_set_features >> is not present. >> >> Fixes: e7868a85e1b2 ("net/core: ensure features get disabled on new lower devs") >> CC: Jarod Wilson >> CC: Jiri Pirko >> CC: Ido Schimmel >> CC: Sander Eikelenboom >> CC: Andy Gospodarek >> CC: Florian Fainelli >> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov >> --- >> Sander please feel free to give your Tested-by. >> >> net/core/dev.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c >> index ab9b8d0d115e..4a1d198dbbff 100644 >> --- a/net/core/dev.c >> +++ b/net/core/dev.c >> @@ -6426,6 +6426,8 @@ int __netdev_update_features(struct net_device *dev) >> >> if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features) >> err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features(dev, features); >> + else >> + err = 0; > > This makes the 'err' initializer pointless. > > MBR, Sergei > It doesn't, there's a previous goto statement that might get hit and we need it to be -1 so we don't signal a feature change.