netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] selftests/net: GRO coalesce test
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:16:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6595b716cb0b37e9daf4202163b4567116d4b4e2.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210805073641.3533280-2-lixiaoyan@google.com>

Hello,

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 07:36 +0000, Coco Li wrote:
> Implement a GRO testsuite that expects Linux kernel GRO behavior.
> All tests pass with the kernel software GRO stack. Run against a device
> with hardware GRO to verify that it matches the software stack.
> 
> gro.c generates packets and sends them out through a packet socket. The
> receiver in gro.c (run separately) receives the packets on a packet
> socket, filters them by destination ports using BPF and checks the
> packet geometry to see whether GRO was applied.
> 
> gro.sh provides a wrapper to run the gro.c in NIC loopback mode.
> It is not included in continuous testing because it modifies network
> configuration around a physical NIC: gro.sh sets the NIC in loopback
> mode, creates macvlan devices on the physical device in separate
> namespaces, and sends traffic generated by gro.c between the two
> namespaces to observe coalescing behavior.

I like this idea a lot!

Have you considered additionally run the same test of top of a veth
pair, and have such tests always enabled, so we could have some
coverage regardless of specific H/W available?

To do the above you should disable TSO on the veth sender peer and
enable GRO on the other end.

[...]
> +  setup_ns
> +  # Each test is run 3 times to deflake, because given the receive timing,
> +  # not all packets that should coalesce will be considered in the same flow
> +  # on every try.

I thought that tuning 'gro_flush_timeout' appropriatelly, you should be
able to control exactly which packets will be aggregated ???

Thanks!

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-05 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05  7:36 [PATCH net-next 0/2] GRO and Toeplitz hash selftests Coco Li
2021-08-05  7:36 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] selftests/net: GRO coalesce test Coco Li
2021-08-05 11:16   ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2021-08-05 20:21     ` Coco Li
     [not found]     ` <CADjXwjhvb9BVNPjY2f-4yfE51RGL88U3VbiN_gwaMSGbagzQEg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-08-06  7:49       ` Paolo Abeni
2021-08-06 17:44         ` Coco Li
2021-08-05  7:36 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests/net: toeplitz test Coco Li
2021-08-05 12:30 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] GRO and Toeplitz hash selftests patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6595b716cb0b37e9daf4202163b4567116d4b4e2.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).