netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	 Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel@quicinc.com,  "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	 bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: Re-use and set mono_delivery_time bit for userspace tstamp packets
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:52:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65f16946cd33e_344ff1294fc@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a4cb416-5d95-459d-8c1c-3fb225240363@linux.dev>

Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 3/1/24 12:13 PM, Abhishek Chauhan wrote:
> > Bridge driver today has no support to forward the userspace timestamp
> > packets and ends up resetting the timestamp. ETF qdisc checks the
> > packet coming from userspace and encounters to be 0 thereby dropping
> > time sensitive packets. These changes will allow userspace timestamps
> > packets to be forwarded from the bridge to NIC drivers.
> > 
> > Setting the same bit (mono_delivery_time) to avoid dropping of
> > userspace tstamp packets in the forwarding path.
> > 
> > Existing functionality of mono_delivery_time remains unaltered here,
> > instead just extended with userspace tstamp support for bridge
> > forwarding path.
> 
> The patch currently broke the bpf selftest test_tc_dtime: 
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/8242487344/job/22541746675
> 
> In particular, there is a uapi field __sk_buff->tstamp_type which currently has 
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO to mean skb->tstamp has the MONO "delivery" time. 
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_UNSPEC means everything else (this could be a rx timestamp at 
> ingress or a delivery time set by user space).
> 
> __sk_buff->tstamp_type depends on skb->mono_delivery_time which does not 
> necessarily mean mono after this patch. I thought about fixing it on the bpf 
> side such that reading __sk_buff->tstamp_type only returns 
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO when the skb->mono_delivery_time is set and skb->sk 
> is IPPROTO_TCP. However, it won't work because of bpf_skb_set_tstamp().
> 
> There is a bpf helper, bpf_skb_set_tstamp(skb, tstamp, 
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO). This helper changes both the skb->tstamp and the 
> skb->mono_delivery_time. The expectation is this could change skb->tstamp in the 
> ingress skb and redirect to egress sch_fq. It could also set a mono time to 
> skb->tstamp where the udp sk->sk_clockid may not be necessary in mono and then 
> bpf_redirect to egress sch_fq. When bpf_skb_set_tstamp(skb, tstamp, 
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO) succeeds, reading __sk_buff->tstamp_type expects 
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO also.
> 
> I ran out of idea to solve this uapi breakage.
> 
> I am afraid it may need to go back to v1 idea and use another bit 
> (user_delivery_time) in the skb.

Is the only conflict when bpf_skb_set_tstamp is called for an skb from
a socket with sk_clockid set (and thus SO_TXTIME called)?

Interpreting skb->tstamp as mono if skb->mono_delivery_time is set and
skb->sk is NULL is fine. This is the ingress to egress redirect case.

I don't see an immediate use for this BPF function on egress where it
would overwrite an SO_TXTIME timestamp and now skb->tstamp is mono,
but skb->sk != NULL and skb->sk->sk_clockid != CLOCK_MONOTONIC.

Perhaps bpf_skb_set_tstamp() can just fail if another delivery time is
already explicitly programmed?

    skb->sk &&
    sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME) &&
    skb->sk->sk_clockid != CLOCK_MONOTONIC

Either that, or unset SOCK_TXTIME to make sk_clockid undefined and
fall back on interpreting as monotonic.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01 20:13 [PATCH net-next v4] net: Re-use and set mono_delivery_time bit for userspace tstamp packets Abhishek Chauhan
2024-03-01 22:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-05 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-03-12 23:52 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13  4:34   ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13  5:32     ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13  8:52   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-03-13 18:42     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13 19:36       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-13 20:59         ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13 21:19           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13 21:41             ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-03-13 21:01         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13 21:26           ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13 21:40             ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-13 22:08               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14  9:49                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-14 19:21                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14 20:28                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-14 20:53                       ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-14 21:48                         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14 21:54                           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14 22:29                           ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-18 19:02                             ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-19 19:46                               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-19 20:12                                 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-20  6:22                               ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-20 20:30                                 ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65f16946cd33e_344ff1294fc@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_abchauha@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).