From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <ast@fb.com>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 14:27:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cb93354-38f7-8eda-9cef-e3c36c408806@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523210359.dz2zwqcb76hebrtn@ast-mbp>
On 5/23/18 2:04 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:13:22AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>>> + __u32 prog_id; /* output: prod_id */
>>> + __u32 attach_info; /* output: BPF_ATTACH_* */
>>> + __u64 probe_offset; /* output: probe_offset */
>>> + __u64 probe_addr; /* output: probe_addr */
>>> + } task_fd_query;
>>> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>>>
>>> /* The description below is an attempt at providing documentation to eBPF
>>> @@ -2458,4 +2475,14 @@ struct bpf_fib_lookup {
>>> __u8 dmac[6]; /* ETH_ALEN */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/* used by <task, fd> based query */
>>> +enum {
>> Nit. Instead of a comment, is it better to give this
>> enum a descriptive name?
>>
>>> + BPF_ATTACH_RAW_TRACEPOINT, /* tp name */
>>> + BPF_ATTACH_TRACEPOINT, /* tp name */
>>> + BPF_ATTACH_KPROBE, /* (symbol + offset) or addr */
>>> + BPF_ATTACH_KRETPROBE, /* (symbol + offset) or addr */
>>> + BPF_ATTACH_UPROBE, /* filename + offset */
>>> + BPF_ATTACH_URETPROBE, /* filename + offset */
>>> +};
>
> One more nit here.
> Can we come up with better names for the above?
> 'attach' is a verb. I cannot help but read above as it's an action
> for the kernel to attach to something and not the type of event
> where the program was attached to.
> Since we pass task+fd into that BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY command how
> about returning BPF_FD_TYPE_KPROBE, BPF_FD_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, ... ?
Okay will use BPF_FD_TYPE_*... which is indeed better than
BPF_ATTACH_*.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 16:30 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] bpf: implement BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY Yonghong Song
2018-05-22 16:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] perf/core: add perf_get_event() to return perf_event given a struct file Yonghong Song
2018-05-22 16:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY Yonghong Song
2018-05-23 17:13 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2018-05-23 21:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-23 21:27 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2018-05-23 21:25 ` Yonghong Song
2018-05-22 16:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/7] tools/bpf: sync kernel header bpf.h and add bpf_trace_event_query in libbpf Yonghong Song
2018-05-22 16:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] tools/bpf: add ksym_get_addr() in trace_helpers Yonghong Song
2018-05-23 17:16 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cb93354-38f7-8eda-9cef-e3c36c408806@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).