netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: ipv4: really enforce backoff for redirects
Date: Fri,  8 May 2020 19:28:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f71c9a7ba0d514c9f2d006f4797b044c824ae84.1588954755.git.pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)

In commit b406472b5ad7 ("net: ipv4: avoid mixed n_redirects and
rate_tokens usage") I missed the fact that a 0 'rate_tokens' will
bypass the backoff algorithm.

Since rate_tokens is cleared after a redirect silence, and never
incremented on redirects, if the host keeps receiving packets
requiring redirect it will reply ignoring the backoff.

Additionally, the 'rate_last' field will be updated with the
cadence of the ingress packet requiring redirect. If that rate is
high enough, that will prevent the host from generating any
other kind of ICMP messages

The check for a zero 'rate_tokens' value was likely a shortcut
to avoid the more complex backoff algorithm after a redirect
silence period. Address the issue checking for 'n_redirects'
instead, which is incremented on successful redirect, and
does not interfere with other ICMP replies.

Fixes: b406472b5ad7 ("net: ipv4: avoid mixed n_redirects and rate_tokens usage")
Reported-and-tested-by: Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 788c69d9bfe0..fa829f31a3f5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ void ip_rt_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	/* Check for load limit; set rate_last to the latest sent
 	 * redirect.
 	 */
-	if (peer->rate_tokens == 0 ||
+	if (peer->n_redirects == 0 ||
 	    time_after(jiffies,
 		       (peer->rate_last +
 			(ip_rt_redirect_load << peer->n_redirects)))) {
-- 
2.21.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08 17:28 Paolo Abeni [this message]
2020-05-09  5:57 ` [PATCH net] net: ipv4: really enforce backoff for redirects Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f71c9a7ba0d514c9f2d006f4797b044c824ae84.1588954755.git.pabeni@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=walters@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).