From: <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>
To: <gustavo@embeddedor.com>, <wg@grandegger.com>,
<mkl@pengutronix.de>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>
Cc: <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] can: at91_can: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:03:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8119fbe8-5f4b-e45c-6687-ec42aceb3428@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208184444.GA28484@embeddedor>
On 08/02/2019 at 19:44, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the /* fall through */
> comments are placed at the bottom of the case statement, which
> is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/at91_can.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
> index d98c69045b17..1718c20f9c99 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
> @@ -902,7 +902,8 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev,
> CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
> CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
> }
> - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
> + /* fall through */
> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> /*
> * from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING
> * to : ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF
> @@ -951,7 +952,8 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev,
> netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Active\n");
> cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT;
> cf->data[2] = CAN_ERR_PROT_ACTIVE;
> - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
> + /* fall through */
> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> reg_idr = AT91_IRQ_ERRA | AT91_IRQ_WARN | AT91_IRQ_BOFF;
> reg_ier = AT91_IRQ_ERRP;
> break;
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 18:44 [PATCH][next] can: at91_can: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-08 18:55 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-02-09 19:17 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-02-11 9:03 ` Nicolas.Ferre [this message]
2019-02-14 21:33 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8119fbe8-5f4b-e45c-6687-ec42aceb3428@microchip.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).