From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sjur BRENDELAND Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:46:04 +0200 Message-ID: <81C3A93C17462B4BBD7E272753C10579232F86B36C@EXDCVYMBSTM005.EQ1STM.local> References: <20120626131543.21e4338894b19f5e02f8bdde@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Per ELLEFSEN , Kim LILLIESTIERNA To: Stephen Rothwell , David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120626131543.21e4338894b19f5e02f8bdde@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/caif/caif_hsi.c between commits 3935600a7f34 ("caif-hsi: > Bugfix - Piggyback'ed embedded CAIF frame lost") and 1fdc7630b2cb > ("caif-hsi: Add missing return in error path") from the net tree and > commits 4e7bb59d49fb ("caif-hsi: Removed dead code") and c41254006377 > ("caif-hsi: Add rtnl support") from the net-next tree. > > I fixed them up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Sorry for late response. Your merge looks perfect. Thanks, Sjur