From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] net/mlx4_en: Force CHECKSUM_NONE for short ethernet frames
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:24:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <860ee92a-6547-342e-0e3e-024562328a90@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549901057-2614-1-git-send-email-tariqt@mellanox.com>
On 02/11/2019 08:04 AM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
>
> When an ethernet frame is padded to meet the minimum ethernet frame
> size, the padding octets are not covered by the hardware checksum.
> Fortunately the padding octets are usually zero's, which don't affect
> checksum. However, it is not guaranteed. For example, switches might
> choose to make other use of these octets.
> This repeatedly causes kernel hardware checksum fault.
>
> Prior to the cited commit below, skb checksum was forced to be
> CHECKSUM_NONE when padding is detected. After it, we need to keep
> skb->csum updated. However, fixing up CHECKSUM_COMPLETE requires to
> verify and parse IP headers, it does not worth the effort as the packets
> are so small that CHECKSUM_COMPLETE has no significant advantage.
>
> Future work: when reporting checksum complete is not an option for
> IP non-TCP/UDP packets, we can actually fallback to report checksum
> unnecessary, by looking at cqe IPOK bit.
>
> Fixes: 88078d98d1bb ("net: pskb_trim_rcsum() and CHECKSUM_COMPLETE are friends")
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Thanks Tariq and Saeed
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 16:04 [PATCH net V2] net/mlx4_en: Force CHECKSUM_NONE for short ethernet frames Tariq Toukan
2019-02-11 17:24 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2019-02-12 17:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=860ee92a-6547-342e-0e3e-024562328a90@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eranbe@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).