netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
To: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	bjorn.topel@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 10:25:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87399C88-4388-4857-AD77-E98527DEFDA4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604184306.362d9d8e@carbon>

On 4 Jun 2019, at 9:43, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:38:51 -0700
> Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, the AF_XDP code uses a separate map in order to
>> determine if an xsk is bound to a queue.  Instead of doing this,
>> have bpf_map_lookup_elem() return the queue_id, as a way of
>> indicating that there is a valid entry at the map index.
>
> Just a reminder, that once we choose a return value, there the
> queue_id, then it basically becomes UAPI, and we cannot change it.

Yes - Alexei initially wanted to return the sk_cookie instead, but
that's 64 bits and opens up a whole other can of worms.


> Can we somehow use BTF to allow us to extend this later?
>
> I was also going to point out that, you cannot return a direct pointer
> to queue_id, as BPF-prog side can modify this... but Daniel already
> pointed this out.

So, I see three solutions here (for this and Toke's patchset also,
which is encountering the same problem).

1) add a scratch register (Toke's approach)
2) add a PTR_TO_<type>, which has the access checked.  This is the most
   flexible approach, but does seem a bit overkill at the moment.
3) add another helper function, say, bpf_map_elem_present() which just
   returns a boolean value indicating whether there is a valid map entry
   or not.

I was starting to do 2), but wanted to get some more feedback first.
-- 
Jonathan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-04 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-03 16:38 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] Better handling of xskmap entries Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-03 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04 14:54   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-06-04 15:30     ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-06-04 16:43   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-04 17:25     ` Jonathan Lemon [this message]
2019-06-04 18:12       ` Martin Lau
2019-06-05  8:45         ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-05 15:42           ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04 18:18       ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-04 20:07       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-06-03 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: remove qidconf and better support external bpf programs Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04  6:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] Better handling of xskmap entries Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87399C88-4388-4857-AD77-E98527DEFDA4@gmail.com \
    --to=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).