netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sameehj@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-xdp: netdev attribute to control xdpgeneric skb linearization
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 19:00:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878slyhx39.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMOZA0K-0LOGMXdFecRUHmyoOmOUabsgvzwA35jB-T=5tzV_TA@mail.gmail.com>

Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:48 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/23/20 10:53 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> > Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> Add a netdevice flag to control skb linearization in generic xdp mode.
>> >> Among the various mechanism to control the flag, the sysfs
>> >> interface seems sufficiently simple and self-contained.
>> >> The attribute can be modified through
>> >>      /sys/class/net/<DEVICE>/xdp_linearize
>> >> The default is 1 (on)
>>
>> Needs documentation in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net.
>>
>> > Erm, won't turning off linearization break the XDP program's ability to
>> > do direct packet access?
>>
>> Yes, in the worst case you only have eth header pulled into linear section. :/
>> In tc/BPF for direct packet access we have bpf_skb_pull_data() helper which can
>> pull in up to X bytes into linear section on demand. I guess something like this
>> could be done for XDP context as well, e.g. generic XDP would pull when non-linear
>> and native XDP would have nothing todo (though in this case you end up writing the
>> prog specifically for generic XDP with slowdown when you'd load it on native XDP
>> where it's linear anyway, but that could/should be documented if so).
>
> There was some discussion on multi-segment xdp
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg620140.html
> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
>
> with no clear decision as far as I can tell.
>
> I wanted to point out that linearization might be an issue for native
> xdp as well (specifically with NICs that do header split, LRO,
> scatter-gather, MTU pagesize ...) and having to unconditionally pay
> the linearization cost (or disable the above features) by just loading
> an xdp program may be a big performance hit.

Right, sure, but then I'd rather fix it for all of XDP instead of
introduce (more) differences between native and generic mode...

-Toke


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 20:32 [PATCH] net-xdp: netdev attribute to control xdpgeneric skb linearization Luigi Rizzo
2020-01-23  9:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-23 15:48   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-01-23 16:14     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-23 17:30       ` Luigi Rizzo
2020-01-23 18:01         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-23 18:06           ` Luigi Rizzo
2020-01-23 21:36             ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-01-24  9:57               ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-24 14:31                 ` Luigi Rizzo
2020-01-24 15:30                   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-24 17:15                     ` Luigi Rizzo
2020-01-24 21:27                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-02-05 15:36                         ` Luigi Rizzo
     [not found]                         ` <CA+hQ2+hnqifXzyHjjc5TXJmJz_EVCbuF6vGchKjaWccfK2ZA4g@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-05 15:55                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-23 17:25     ` Luigi Rizzo
2020-01-23 18:00       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2020-01-23 18:11         ` Luigi Rizzo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878slyhx39.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lrizzo@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameehj@amazon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).