From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: samples/bpf: split off legacy stuff from bpf_helpers.h
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:27:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k19lpzfv.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzb7ikPkrxCVMtHK5rS2kdoF_mo5_Bn5U78zKBiYYHS8ig@mail.gmail.com>
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:35 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> writes:
>>
>> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c
>> > index 2b2ffb97018b..f47ee513cb7c 100644
>> > --- a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c
>> > +++ b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c
>> > @@ -9,25 +9,26 @@
>> > #include <linux/version.h>
>> > #include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
>> > #include "bpf_helpers.h"
>> > +#include "bpf_legacy.h"
>> >
>> > #define MAX_ENTRIES 1000
>> > #define MAX_NR_CPUS 1024
>> >
>> > -struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") hash_map = {
>> > +struct bpf_map_def_legacy SEC("maps") hash_map = {
>> > .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH,
>> > .key_size = sizeof(u32),
>> > .value_size = sizeof(long),
>> > .max_entries = MAX_ENTRIES,
>> > };
>>
>> Why switch these when they're not actually using any of the extra fields
>> in map_def_legacy?
>
> See below, they have to be uniform-sized.
>
>> >
>> > -struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") lru_hash_map = {
>> > +struct bpf_map_def_legacy SEC("maps") lru_hash_map = {
>> > .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH,
>> > .key_size = sizeof(u32),
>> > .value_size = sizeof(long),
>> > .max_entries = 10000,
>> > };
>> >
>> > -struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") nocommon_lru_hash_map = {
>> > +struct bpf_map_def_legacy SEC("maps") nocommon_lru_hash_map = {
>> > .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH,
>> > .key_size = sizeof(u32),
>> > .value_size = sizeof(long),
>> > @@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") nocommon_lru_hash_map = {
>> > .map_flags = BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU,
>> > };
>> >
>> > -struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") inner_lru_hash_map = {
>> > +struct bpf_map_def_legacy SEC("maps") inner_lru_hash_map = {
>> > .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH,
>> > .key_size = sizeof(u32),
>> > .value_size = sizeof(long),
>> > @@ -44,20 +45,20 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") inner_lru_hash_map = {
>> > .numa_node = 0,
>> > };
>>
>> Or are you just switching everything because of this one?
>
> Exactly. Another way would be to switch all but this to BTF-based one,
> but I didn't want to make this patch set even bigger, we can always do
> that later
Right, fair enough :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 21:50 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/7] Move bpf_helpers and add BPF_CORE_READ macros Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/7] selftests/bpf: undo GCC-specific bpf_helpers.h changes Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: samples/bpf: split off legacy stuff from bpf_helpers.h Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 7:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 16:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 16:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-10-03 17:31 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-03 20:08 ` Song Liu
2019-10-03 21:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/7] selftests/bpf: adjust CO-RE reloc tests for new bpf_core_read() macro Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 20:16 ` Song Liu
2019-10-03 20:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 20:41 ` Song Liu
2019-10-03 21:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/7] selftests/bpf: split off tracing-only helpers into bpf_tracing.h Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 7:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 16:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 17:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 17:33 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-03 20:18 ` Song Liu
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: move bpf_{helpers,endian,tracing}.h into libbpf Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 20:22 ` Song Liu
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: add BPF_CORE_READ/BPF_CORE_READ_INTO helpers Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-03 20:35 ` Song Liu
2019-10-03 21:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: add BPF_CORE_READ and BPF_CORE_READ_STR_INTO macro tests Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k19lpzfv.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).