From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24590C4361B for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E071A23339 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726328AbgLGKlO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 05:41:14 -0500 Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]:43549 "EHLO so254-31.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725794AbgLGKlN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 05:41:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1607337648; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=SJSbCik9Tek06j7dEaYsZTY3s+Lwk19Ci7mR6nO9gjk=; b=MTmgEmhbaSeZCkjyJg+yMKVFT3MzBgNCGgSV7j23pW2qQlxQ/NfjpF2C5xxyQaIBoEHKL/3p wCOCboi6GB/TZnx0Bn7JtTUzTvwOiDda4wJkf/QWR0DFLF17q9mha+PmSkqmff4Pk5hYihMq jHq2vVYfe6X44zWJvdMmwIIE7ck= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.31 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJiZjI2MiIsICJuZXRkZXZAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fce0692ae7b105766e29498 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:40:18 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 24AF6C433C6; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24E1C433CA; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:40:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org B24E1C433CA Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next-2020-12-03 References: <20201203185732.9CFA5C433ED@smtp.codeaurora.org> <20201204111715.04d5b198@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:40:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20201204111715.04d5b198@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:17:15 -0800") Message-ID: <87tusxgar5.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Kalle Valo wrote: >> wireless-drivers-next patches for v5.11 >> >> First set of patches for v5.11. rtw88 getting improvements to work >> better with Bluetooth and other driver also getting some new features. >> mhi-ath11k-immutable branch was pulled from mhi tree to avoid >> conflicts with mhi tree. > > Pulled, but there are a lot of fixes in here which look like they > should have been part of the other PR, if you ask me. Yeah, I'm actually on purpose keeping the bar high for patches going to wireless-drivers (ie. the fixes going to -rc releases). This is just to keep things simple for me and avoiding the number of conflicts between the trees. > There's also a patch which looks like it renames a module parameter. > Module parameters are considered uAPI. Ah, I have been actually wondering that if they are part of user space API or not, good to know that they are. I'll keep an eye of this in the future so that we are not breaking the uAPI with module parameter changes. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches