From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0F3C433DB for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8294464F8F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229658AbhCQAil (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 20:38:41 -0400 Received: from mo-csw1114.securemx.jp ([210.130.202.156]:38506 "EHLO mo-csw.securemx.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229787AbhCQAie (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 20:38:34 -0400 Received: by mo-csw.securemx.jp (mx-mo-csw1114) id 12H0c5oj010866; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:38:05 +0900 X-Iguazu-Qid: 2wHHVZPeG5ucmL6geC X-Iguazu-QSIG: v=2; s=0; t=1615941485; q=2wHHVZPeG5ucmL6geC; m=S1/Z8TipOfdF+lZx/g/AJZmYGFrUSSpAGmySTsH17QU= Received: from imx12-a.toshiba.co.jp (imx12-a.toshiba.co.jp [61.202.160.135]) by relay.securemx.jp (mx-mr1113) id 12H0c3RV023313 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:38:04 +0900 Received: from enc02.toshiba.co.jp (enc02.toshiba.co.jp [61.202.160.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imx12-a.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF73A1000CF; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:38:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from hop101.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.85.107]) by enc02.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id 12H0c2BK015459; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:38:03 +0900 From: Punit Agrawal To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, daichi1.fukui@toshiba.co.jp, nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp, Corinna Vinschen , Jacob Keller , Aaron Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.4.y, v4.9.y] igb: Remove incorrect "unexpected SYS WRAP" log message References: <20210225005406.530767-1-punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:38:01 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Greg KH's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:17:54 +0100") X-TSB-HOP: ON Message-ID: <87wnu6sjh2.fsf@kokedama.swc.toshiba.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, Greg KH writes: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:54:06AM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> From: Corinna Vinschen >> >> commit 2643e6e90210e16c978919617170089b7c2164f7 upstream >> >> TSAUXC.DisableSystime is never set, so SYSTIM runs into a SYS WRAP >> every 1100 secs on 80580/i350/i354 (40 bit SYSTIM) and every 35000 >> secs on 80576 (45 bit SYSTIM). >> >> This wrap event sets the TSICR.SysWrap bit unconditionally. >> >> However, checking TSIM at interrupt time shows that this event does not >> actually cause the interrupt. Rather, it's just bycatch while the >> actual interrupt is caused by, for instance, TSICR.TXTS. >> >> The conclusion is that the SYS WRAP is actually expected, so the >> "unexpected SYS WRAP" message is entirely bogus and just helps to >> confuse users. Drop it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen >> Acked-by: Jacob Keller >> Tested-by: Aaron Brown >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher >> --- >> [ Due to confusion about stable rules for networking the request was >> mistakenly sent to netdev only[0]. Apologies if you're seeing this >> again. ] > > No signed-off-by: from you? :( Apologies for the missing the SoB. And thank you for applying the patch to stable even so. [ Sorry for the long dealy in responding. Our mail system was having issues (dropping emails randomly) and looks like this mail got caught up during that period. ]