netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com,
	jiang.wang@bytedance.com, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v4 03/11] skmsg: introduce skb_send_sock() for sock_map
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:42:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgz93oiv.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210310053222.41371-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:32 AM CET, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
>
> We only have skb_send_sock_locked() which requires callers
> to use lock_sock(). Introduce a variant skb_send_sock()
> which locks on its own, callers do not need to lock it
> any more. This will save us from adding a ->sendmsg_locked
> for each protocol.
>
> To reuse the code, pass function pointers to __skb_send_sock()
> and build skb_send_sock() and skb_send_sock_locked() on top.
>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/skbuff.h |  1 +
>  net/core/skbuff.c      | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 0503c917d773..2fc8c3657c53 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -3626,6 +3626,7 @@ int skb_splice_bits(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk, unsigned int offset,
>  		    unsigned int flags);
>  int skb_send_sock_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
>  			 int len);
> +int skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int len);
>  void skb_copy_and_csum_dev(const struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *to);
>  unsigned int skb_zerocopy_headlen(const struct sk_buff *from);
>  int skb_zerocopy(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 545a472273a5..396586bd6ae3 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -2500,9 +2500,12 @@ int skb_splice_bits(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk, unsigned int offset,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_splice_bits);
>
> -/* Send skb data on a socket. Socket must be locked. */
> -int skb_send_sock_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
> -			 int len)
> +typedef int (*sendmsg_func)(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> +			    struct kvec *vec, size_t num, size_t size);
> +typedef int (*sendpage_func)(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
> +			   size_t size, int flags);
> +static int __skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
> +			   int len, sendmsg_func sendmsg, sendpage_func sendpage)
>  {
>  	unsigned int orig_len = len;
>  	struct sk_buff *head = skb;
> @@ -2522,7 +2525,7 @@ int skb_send_sock_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
>  		memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
>  		msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
>
> -		ret = kernel_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, &kv, 1, slen);
> +		ret = sendmsg(sk, &msg, &kv, 1, slen);


Maybe use INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE() and INDIRECT_CALL_2() since there
are just two possibilities? Same for sendpage below.

>  		if (ret <= 0)
>  			goto error;
>
> @@ -2553,9 +2556,9 @@ int skb_send_sock_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
>  		slen = min_t(size_t, len, skb_frag_size(frag) - offset);
>
>  		while (slen) {
> -			ret = kernel_sendpage_locked(sk, skb_frag_page(frag),
> -						     skb_frag_off(frag) + offset,
> -						     slen, MSG_DONTWAIT);
> +			ret = sendpage(sk, skb_frag_page(frag),
> +				       skb_frag_off(frag) + offset,
> +				       slen, MSG_DONTWAIT);
>  			if (ret <= 0)
>  				goto error;
>

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10  5:32 [Patch bpf-next v4 00/11] sockmap: introduce BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT and support UDP Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 01/11] skmsg: lock ingress_skb when purging Cong Wang
2021-03-11 10:52   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 02/11] skmsg: introduce a spinlock to protect ingress_msg Cong Wang
2021-03-11 11:28   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-03-12  0:45     ` Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 03/11] skmsg: introduce skb_send_sock() for sock_map Cong Wang
2021-03-11 11:42   ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2021-03-12  0:47     ` Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 04/11] skmsg: avoid lock_sock() in sk_psock_backlog() Cong Wang
2021-03-12 12:02   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-03-13 17:32     ` Cong Wang
2021-03-15 20:55       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 05/11] sock_map: introduce BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 06/11] sock: introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot() Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 07/11] udp: implement ->read_sock() for sockmap Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 08/11] skmsg: extract __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() and tcp_bpf_wait_data() Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 09/11] udp: implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 10/11] sock_map: update sock type checks for UDP Cong Wang
2021-03-10  5:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v4 11/11] selftests/bpf: add a test case for udp sockmap Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgz93oiv.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=jiang.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).