From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>, kuznet <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
yoshfuji <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
liuhangbin <liuhangbin@gmail.com>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:43:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b05710f-5718-986d-659c-916e2b85c892@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112162423.6b4de8d1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On 11/12/20 4:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say
> that the tag is only appropriate if someone is sending a fix up/follow
> up patch?
>
> Folks keep adding those tags on the next revisions of the their patches
> which is quite misleading.
I think it's still fair for the lkp folks to get *some* credit for
reporting these bugs. I mean, the stated reason[1] for it existing is:
The Reported-by tag gives credit to people who find bugs and
report them and it hopefully inspires them to help us again in
the future.
I do agree, though, that it's confusing *what* they reported, especially
if the patch in question is fixing something *else*. Rather than invent
a new tag, maybe a comment would suffice:
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> # bug in earlier revision
1.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <175b25d0c79.f8ce5734515834.1635475016968827598@shytyi.net>
2020-11-10 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-11 1:34 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 20:37 ` [PATCH net-next V2] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-12 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next V3] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-12 16:55 ` Hideaki Yoshifuji
2020-11-13 1:50 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-13 0:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-13 1:50 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-13 1:56 ` [PATCH net-next V4] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-13 12:38 ` Hideaki Yoshifuji
2020-11-13 19:09 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-13 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next V5] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-17 20:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-18 13:41 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-18 15:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-18 15:56 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-19 13:37 ` [PATCH net-next V6] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-19 18:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-19 19:31 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-20 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-20 9:26 ` [PATCH net-next V7] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-23 13:26 ` Hideaki Yoshifuji
2020-11-27 16:54 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-12-09 3:27 ` [PATCH net-next V8] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-12-16 0:00 ` David Miller
2020-12-16 14:01 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-12-16 17:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-12-16 21:56 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2020-12-16 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next V9] " Dmytro Shytyi
2020-12-19 2:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-12-19 2:40 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2021-07-12 13:39 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-07-12 16:42 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-07-12 17:51 ` Erik Kline
2021-07-13 18:47 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-07-10 19:24 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-07-12 13:23 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-10-13 23:03 ` [PATCH net-next V10] " Dmytro Shytyi
2021-10-13 23:20 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-10-14 18:26 ` Erik Kline
2021-10-14 21:36 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2021-10-14 13:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-13 0:24 ` [PATCH net-next] " Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-13 0:32 ` [kbuild-all] " Li, Philip
2020-11-13 0:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-13 1:01 ` Li, Philip
2020-11-13 1:43 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2020-11-13 1:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-13 2:01 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b05710f-5718-986d-659c-916e2b85c892@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmytro@shytyi.net \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).