netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, ast@kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com,
	andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for !CONFIG_BPF_JIT
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:55:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9247bdf6-ced1-aed7-c6b6-8f554bd796fc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4447a335-6311-3470-7546-dff06672a200@iogearbox.net>

Hi Daniel,

Sorry for the inconvenience, It's our fault. the patch("bpf: Add 
bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for !CONFIG_BPF_JIT") has been applied into 
bpf-next/master,
but kbuild bot catched the patch("bpf: add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for 
!CONFIG_BPF_JIT") and applied it again.

$ git log --oneline 
linux-review/Daniel-Borkmann/bpf-add-bpf_jit_blinding_enabled-for-CONFIG_BPF_JIT/20191125-042008 
-n5
139a0e0d24031 bpf: add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for !CONFIG_BPF_JIT
b633b4ea8a963 bpf: Simplify __bpf_arch_text_poke poke type handling
11d450039666e bpf: Introduce BPF_TRACE_x helper for the tracing tests
691ed80326693 bpf: Add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for !CONFIG_BPF_JIT
eb41045096419 Merge branch 'optimize-bpf_tail_call'

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

On 11/25/19 3:27 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> [ +Philip, +Fengguang ]
>
> On 11/24/19 11:54 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
>> [cannot apply to v5.4-rc8 next-20191122]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a 
>> note to help
>> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to 
>> specify the
>> base tree in git format-patch, please see 
>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
>>
>> url: 
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Borkmann/bpf-add-bpf_jit_blinding_enabled-for-CONFIG_BPF_JIT/20191125-042008
>> base: 
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
>> config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
>> reproduce:
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          make ARCH=i386
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     In file included from include/net/sock.h:59:0,
>>                      from include/linux/tcp.h:19,
>>                      from include/linux/ipv6.h:87,
>>                      from include/net/ipv6.h:12,
>>                      from include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h:28,
>>                      from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:32,
>>                      from init/do_mounts.c:23:
>>>> include/linux/filter.h:1061:20: error: redefinition of 
>>>> 'bpf_jit_blinding_enabled'
>>      static inline bool bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>     include/linux/filter.h:1056:20: note: previous definition of 
>> 'bpf_jit_blinding_enabled' was here
>>      static inline bool bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Hmm, can't reproduce with above .config for `make ARCH=i386`. The 
> .config doesn't have
> CONFIG_BPF_JIT, and given there's only exactly *one* definition of 
> bpf_jit_blinding_enabled()
> for CONFIG_BPF_JIT and *one* for !CONFIG_BPF_JIT this build bot 
> warning feels invalid to me
> (unless I'm completely blind and missing something obvious, but the 
> succeeded kernel build
> seems to agree with me).
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>> vim +/bpf_jit_blinding_enabled +1061 include/linux/filter.h
>>
>>    1060
>>> 1061    static inline bool bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(struct bpf_prog 
>>> *prog)
>>    1062    {
>>    1063        return false;
>>    1064    }
>>    1065
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source 
>> Technology Center
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel 
>> Corporation
>>
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@lists.01.org


      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-26  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-23 20:37 Daniel Borkmann
2019-11-23 21:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-11-24 22:54 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-25  7:27   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-11-26  5:55     ` Rong Chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9247bdf6-ced1-aed7-c6b6-8f554bd796fc@intel.com \
    --to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for '\!'CONFIG_BPF_JIT' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).