From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com, cris.forno@ibm.com,
pradeeps@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wilder@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [ PATCH v1 2/2] ibmveth: Identify ingress large send packets.
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:40:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSc8qw_U=nKR0tM06z99Es8JVKR0P6rQpR=Bkwj1eOtXCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201008190538.6223-3-dwilder@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:06 PM David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Ingress large send packets are identified by either:
> The IBMVETH_RXQ_LRG_PKT flag in the receive buffer
> or with a -1 placed in the ip header checksum.
> The method used depends on firmware version.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cristobal Forno <cris.forno@ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeeps@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> index 3935a7e..e357cbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> @@ -1349,6 +1349,7 @@ static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> int offset = ibmveth_rxq_frame_offset(adapter);
> int csum_good = ibmveth_rxq_csum_good(adapter);
> int lrg_pkt = ibmveth_rxq_large_packet(adapter);
> + __sum16 iph_check = 0;
>
> skb = ibmveth_rxq_get_buffer(adapter);
>
> @@ -1385,7 +1386,17 @@ static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> skb_put(skb, length);
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, netdev);
>
> - if (length > netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN) {
> + /* PHYP without PLSO support places a -1 in the ip
> + * checksum for large send frames.
> + */
> + if (be16_to_cpu(skb->protocol) == ETH_P_IP) {
> + struct iphdr *iph = (struct iphdr *)skb->data;
> +
> + iph_check = iph->check;
Check against truncated/bad packets.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-10 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 19:05 [ PATCH v1 0/2] ibmveth gso fix David Wilder
2020-10-08 19:05 ` [ PATCH v1 1/2] ibmveth: Switch order of ibmveth_helper calls David Wilder
2020-10-10 16:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-10-08 19:05 ` [ PATCH v1 2/2] ibmveth: Identify ingress large send packets David Wilder
2020-10-10 16:40 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2020-10-10 16:51 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-10-11 18:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-12 22:30 ` dwilder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+FuTSc8qw_U=nKR0tM06z99Es8JVKR0P6rQpR=Bkwj1eOtXCw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=cris.forno@ibm.com \
--cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pradeeps@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wilder@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).