netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: Re: x86_64: 5.6.0: locking/lockdep.c:1155 lockdep_register_key
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:15:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtCV55uuArU4OLCTaaBPk7BDeZyOBUHoScN4NsbQeuPhA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpXQdgwFwUONX+za5vJbcXP9krwz_--pG+z_Etf_v8K2mw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 02:20, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:58 AM Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Linux mainline kernel 5.6.0 running kselftest on i386 kernel running on
> > x86_64 devices we have noticed this kernel warning.
>
> This is odd, the warning complains a lockdep key is static, but
> all of the 3 lockdep keys in netdev_register_lockdep_key() are
> dynamic. I don't see how this warning could happen.

I request to provide a debug patch which prints a detailed log.
Happy to test it again with your debug patch and will provide more information.


- Naresh

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07  9:57 x86_64: 5.6.0: locking/lockdep.c:1155 lockdep_register_key Naresh Kamboju
2020-04-10 20:50 ` Cong Wang
2020-04-16 17:45   ` Naresh Kamboju [this message]
2020-05-13 17:00     ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+G9fYtCV55uuArU4OLCTaaBPk7BDeZyOBUHoScN4NsbQeuPhA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).