From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] add phylink support for PCS
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:57:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hpk+TMofHFjg_Z-UZOPp+7zn29ZNLFP+JKreJtbZouiZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311125445.GO25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 14:54, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:46:33PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 14:09, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This series adds support for IEEE 802.3 register set compliant PCS
> > > for phylink. In order to do this, we:
> > >
> > > 1. convert the existing (unused) mii_lpa_to_ethtool_lpa_x() function
> > > to a linkmode variant.
> > > 2. add a helper for clause 37 advertisements, supporting both the
> > > 1000baseX and defacto 2500baseX variants. Note that ethtool does
> > > not support half duplex for either of these, and we make no effort
> > > to do so.
> > > 3. add accessors for modifying a MDIO device register, and use them in
> > > phylib, rather than duplicating the code from phylib.
> >
> > Have you considered accessing the PCS as a phy_device structure, a la
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c?
>
> I don't want to tie this into phylib, because I don't think phylib
> should be dealing with PCS. It brings with it many problems, such as:
>
Agree that the struct mdio_device -> struct phy_device diff is pretty
much useless to a PCS.
> 1. how do we know whether the Clause 22 registers are supposed to be
> Clause 37 format.
Well, they are, aren't they?
> 2. how do we program the PCS appropriately for the negotiation results
> (which phylib doesn't support).
You mean how to read the LPA and logically-AND it with ADV?
The PCS doesn't need to be "programmed" according to the resolved link
state. Maybe the MAC does.
> 3. how do we deal with selecting the appropriate device for the mode
> selected (LX2160A has multiple different PCS which depend on the
> mode selected.)
What I've been doing is to call get_phy_device with an is_c45 argument
depending on the PHY interface type.
Actually the real problem in your case is that the LX2160A doesn't
expose a valid PHY ID in registers 2&3 (unlike other Layerscape PCS
implementations), so get_phy_device is likely going to fail unless
some sort of PHY ID fixup is not done.
>
> Note that a phy_device structure embeds a mdio_device structure, and
> so these helpers can be used inside phylib if one desires - so this
> approach is more flexible than "bolt it into phylib" approach would
> be.
>
It's hard to really say without seeing more than one caller of these
new helpers.
For example the sja1105 DSA switch has a PCS for SGMII (not supported
yet in mainline) that kind-of-emulates a C22 register map, except that
it's accessed over SPI, and that the "pcs_get_state" needs to look at
some vendor-specific registers too. From that perspective, I was
thinking that PHYLINK could be given a phy_device structure with the
advertising, supported and lp_advertising linkmode bit fields
populated who-knows-how, and PHYLINK just resolves that into its
phylink_link_state structure.
But then I guess that sort of hardware is not among your target
candidates for the generic helpers. Whoever can't expose an MDIO bus
or needs to access any vendor-specific register just shouldn't use
these functions. And maybe you're right, I don't really know what the
balance in practice will be.
> > > 4. add support for decoding the advertisement from clause 22 compatible
> > > register sets for clause 37 advertisements and SGMII advertisements.
> > > 5. add support for clause 45 register sets for 10GBASE-R PCS.
> > >
> > > These have been tested on the LX2160A Clearfog-CX platform.
> > >
> > > drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 55 +++++++++++
> > > drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c | 31 ------
> > > drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mdio.h | 4 +
> > > include/linux/mii.h | 57 +++++++----
> > > include/linux/phy.h | 19 ++++
> > > include/linux/phylink.h | 8 ++
> > > include/uapi/linux/mii.h | 5 +
> > > 8 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up
Regards,
-Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-11 12:06 [PATCH net-next 0/5] add phylink support for PCS Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-11 12:07 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: mii: convert mii_lpa_to_ethtool_lpa_x() to linkmode variant Russell King
2020-03-11 12:07 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: mii: add linkmode_adv_to_mii_adv_x() Russell King
2020-03-11 12:07 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mdiobus: add APIs for modifying a MDIO device register Russell King
2020-03-11 12:07 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phylink: pcs: add 802.3 clause 22 helpers Russell King
2020-03-11 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-03-11 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-11 18:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-03-11 19:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-11 19:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-03-11 20:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-12 12:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-03-12 13:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-12 13:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-03-11 12:07 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: phylink: pcs: add 802.3 clause 45 helpers Russell King
2020-03-11 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] add phylink support for PCS Vladimir Oltean
2020-03-11 12:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-11 13:57 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2020-03-11 17:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-11 18:16 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+h21hpk+TMofHFjg_Z-UZOPp+7zn29ZNLFP+JKreJtbZouiZQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).