From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:12:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACAyw98gTrzf8+cPnBEC5A3_rg70UUrJxtV9a_w-dMpKn0Wicg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYuvE-RsT5Ee+FstZ=vuy3AMd+1j7DazFSb56+hfPKPig@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 07:29, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Curious, is there any supported architecture where this is not the
> case? I think it's fine to be consistent, tbh, and use int. Worst
> case, in some obscure architecture we'd need to create a copy of an
> array. Doesn't seem like a big deal (and highly unlikely anyways).
Ok, thanks! I'm not super familiar with C platform differences, so I wanted
to be on the safe side. I'll take this up depending on the outcome of the
conversation with Alexey, maybe I don't need to add this after all.
--
Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK
www.cloudflare.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 10:57 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: consolidate shared test timing code Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: add for_each_bpf_prog helper Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: allow multiple programs in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: add PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-23 1:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-23 10:10 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-24 6:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] tools: libbpf: allow testing program types with multi-prog semantics Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] selftests: bpf: convert sk_lookup multi prog tests to PROG_TEST_RUN Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] selftests: bpf: convert sk_lookup ctx access " Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-16 10:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests: bpf: check that PROG_TEST_RUN repeats as requested Lorenz Bauer
2021-02-17 20:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs John Fastabend
2021-02-23 7:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 10:12 ` Lorenz Bauer [this message]
2021-02-24 21:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACAyw98gTrzf8+cPnBEC5A3_rg70UUrJxtV9a_w-dMpKn0Wicg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).