From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDF2C4CED1 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155B92133F for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="mHoyMz44" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731545AbfJDVon (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:44:43 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:45465 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730508AbfJDVon (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:44:43 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id q64so7895194ljb.12 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 14:44:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Am86CuSg4L4/4SThzqZ+x3OfLvEnqGtERkpRQqbTyyo=; b=mHoyMz44D2WiAxEQObuEHX6G00RlGGHzOJlRf4ram5Uw4WSYGsCgGObrFsOGL0bJUT aiOzQh7CHwV1qQrdMAcusBqOeNWE6EjE6sSFbCZcwuTGGZn02ga15PNfBS2AMwITwVdF EgKmzjP7XWS2xGmR0xPdrifdKD01SMM9eyR/Bt3tAd77+2Ivj48bbb+2FqdbrTquiFwI AcH8C6wUr68r8TNz0boFXRi344UGq9c9qA49TbQE5FyalLJ0dE328a/7G+MyE//kvAAz jYVahOt3Ou685MUsdu1JMEGKJNG2KJmxEad8vqpvyFD797Go+4+z9KOMWd+4luzNMZhI +H7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Am86CuSg4L4/4SThzqZ+x3OfLvEnqGtERkpRQqbTyyo=; b=C87en+MbiLX5LiYomzsuWozHxxsEumzGgvxmdzEE2NcLivVWZYMlP+71mvEvoLOz3M CCgykItppC3iuZJznuT2+tQEoOh9oDWLTF5nVCkB633M2ia63Hx5oaQG3nzCp8BhWqeq abcvRr8UQA2iS2n/SpygR5y+XnwZIUy//bbCX3AfIe1d0F4js/RlypV6a9RrXfNA/5Dy HZkSXKn6wrAo0SzyUgH+QZTppnvg7C9nfsJe3y7Pd12A2mr7h3lsoaAFK5/SnnGyNBpt jR2lwrPdEEdz8iPiXGFlsP8pUkFy0DLzk2c5wgLPN+YPKglg9Pq3P+BQg5bo/fkberxG PXQw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVb8VnxgFkucjAhNz2Z0ybUzD0MVIAXUp+ppy+ASQMk5kMyb2ZI U7G8plpC+1PQkrN5JOzBVzNDb0SL7YTyKbEZoSkvKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwroM5221kd6DE0lMFbDD6+AtmXgtU5HwVqu+4VQvfXVATqsHb0Kap1NezC3fWlTCLdds9tQ/fVqjmiw3vaPP0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:894b:: with SMTP id b11mr10681582ljk.152.1570225481142; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 14:44:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20190917002207.GJ237523@dtor-ws> <20190930224456.GV237523@dtor-ws> In-Reply-To: <20190930224456.GV237523@dtor-ws> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 23:44:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Andrew Lunn , Andrzej Hajda , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , Russell King , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:45 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > So I guess we missed -rc1. Any chance we could get an immutable branch > off -rc1 that you will pull into your main branch and I hopefully can > persuade other maintainers to pull as well so we do not need to drag it > over 2+ merge windows? Yes I'm sorry. I was swamped with stabilizing the kernel. I made an immutable branch and tried to use zeroday for testing but it timed out so I folded it in for-next anyways after som basic tests. Yours, Linus Walleij