From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:21:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CADVnQyncPCCp5T+jDU=S4KF-X+Od8sPFJGEdFhWE9k5VABJqFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170807120113.5e51eec0@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170807120113.5e51eec0@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   a2815817ffa6 ("tcp: enable xmit timer fix by having TLP use time when RTO should fire")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
>   bb4d991a28cc ("tcp: adjust tail loss probe timeout")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Sorry about that. Will try to follow that procedure in the future.

thanks,
neal