netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: "Leppanen, Jere (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <jere.leppanen@nokia.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de"
	<michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: return a one-to-one type socket when doing peeloff
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:38:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_ewk7mGNr6T4smWeQ0TcW3q4yabKZwGX3dK=XcH7gv=KQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0702MB3610BB291019DD7F51DBC906ECE40@HE1PR0702MB3610.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 2:38 AM Leppanen, Jere (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
<jere.leppanen@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Xin Long wrote:
>
> > As it says in rfc6458#section-9.2:
> >
> >   The application uses the sctp_peeloff() call to branch off an
> >   association into a separate socket.  (Note that the semantics are
> >   somewhat changed from the traditional one-to-one style accept()
> >   call.)  Note also that the new socket is a one-to-one style socket.
> >   Thus, it will be confined to operations allowed for a one-to-one
> >   style socket.
> >
> > Prior to this patch, sctp_peeloff() returned a one-to-many type socket,
> > on which some operations are not allowed, like shutdown, as Jere
> > reported.
> >
> > This patch is to change it to return a one-to-one type socket instead.
>
> Thanks for looking into this. I like the patch, and it fixes my simple
> test case.
>
> But with this patch, peeled-off sockets are created by copying from a
> one-to-many socket to a one-to-one socket. Are you sure that that's
> not going to cause any problems? Is it possible that there was a
> reason why peeloff wasn't implemented this way in the first place?
I'm not sure, it's been there since very beginning, and I couldn't find
any changelog about it.

I guess it was trying to differentiate peeled-off socket from TCP style
sockets.

>
> With this patch there's no way to create UDP_HIGH_BANDWIDTH style
> sockets anymore, so the remaining references should probably be
> cleaned up:
>
> ./net/sctp/socket.c:1886:       if (!sctp_style(sk, UDP_HIGH_BANDWIDTH) && msg->msg_name) {
> ./net/sctp/socket.c:8522:       if (sctp_style(sk, UDP_HIGH_BANDWIDTH))
> ./include/net/sctp/structs.h:144:       SCTP_SOCKET_UDP_HIGH_BANDWIDTH,
>
> This patch disables those checks. The first one ignores a destination
> address given to sendmsg() with a peeled-off socket - I don't know
> why. The second one prevents listen() on a peeled-off socket.
My understanding is:
UDP_HIGH_BANDWIDTH is another kind of one-to-one socket, like TCP style.
it can get asoc by its socket when sending msg, doesn't need daddr.

Now I thinking to fix your issue in sctp_shutdown():

@@ -5163,7 +5163,7 @@ static void sctp_shutdown(struct sock *sk, int how)
        struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
        struct sctp_endpoint *ep;

-       if (!sctp_style(sk, TCP))
+       if (sctp_style(sk, UDP))
                return;

in this way, we actually think:
one-to-many socket: UDP style socket
one-to-one socket includes: UDP_HIGH_BANDWIDTH and TCP style sockets.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-04  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02  6:57 [PATCH net] sctp: return a one-to-one type socket when doing peeloff Xin Long
2020-03-03 18:38 ` Leppanen, Jere (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
2020-03-04  9:38   ` Xin Long [this message]
2020-03-04 17:13     ` Jere Leppanen
2020-03-05 14:01       ` David Laight
2020-03-05 17:31         ` Jere Leppanen
2020-03-11  3:34       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-03-11 18:41         ` Jere Leppanen
2020-03-10  1:09 ` David Miller
2020-03-11  3:35   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-03-13  0:27 ` [sctp] 38ec705901: ltp.test_peeloff.fail kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADvbK_ewk7mGNr6T4smWeQ0TcW3q4yabKZwGX3dK=XcH7gv=KQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jere.leppanen@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).