From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F990C55ABD for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17019206A1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KaMyqlkT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731287AbgKJPgu (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:36:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43036 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730139AbgKJPgu (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:36:50 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9E6C0613CF; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id y16so15179694ljk.1; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:36:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yCkfPOQLt6gc9t/YVztMhlgr4Q0m8ZRXrNAsWzJdQfY=; b=KaMyqlkTsiPf3suhjyjMamyRy8K4B1u/3SRxjjEwZ97h5crMUSVRfFhlJl6KUXcwhT 1n2y2lPMK3Q8k2id7wHAnzTuAJ45PV3xjtFz6DR7FGTO6teld0ujevZqdKa25Edo25sG DfipG5Cca4lhBFCQ8TMary0klLHMfmUZrRiKBzhUfQHAVAW7qo6c3a6RiE1SPWW0hZ6s Vyrb0BLOE0tfJteCnWGj+f8VqYQ+bqyEuaMvqCOf8th7I4kBy7zMFKVT9PapKkPdT8z5 b0pEKfzXW5iHiI5KGKiRsf5+nWPcEoNFldHfloFY3M2nUZCODbCUy5YFZV1lHWO5vWtC Picw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yCkfPOQLt6gc9t/YVztMhlgr4Q0m8ZRXrNAsWzJdQfY=; b=EnnkCbVFEVgT9ahoGLlHQfo4n+BfRKvx4S60aKz3wpRSVh8YI8fSdni+q+0LT5Ov4j XkPrksPNPCqaT8KJakrisHQm1A2tNxXhNI2uFvfD92fWON/ZI640cD1Bnq3KNb3wLRZV ymtxQF6EOkyHhrJFxO1Q3svzKhtLi0g+5/ZBuLKcbmhyMyxxv15LFGIuzBi5Dss0WGB5 idF68HO8oFvq0Veu+KJJs+BGVIOqRd8AzVbfxZy7EYURw9GPSAbNZB4V6BdbA05aVVYX 7dMOFgPITOGBoR3urQcAWL/6UP/09No8EaqkCbms/Isd0DKQksPC1Xa8e3kbYMph1HP8 pbpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532d1DNMGqrrXljnPbJ0bp6NOabDPkjr2Srv/QY32y4dEyHQ1Kv0 S0eRcUiaqy78p31DdU3zurfG5hrRRAaK0g/3zn8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3sLVI0y9BKV7BKGuHRya4tYsmojgjE0CKJCKR0tZle6ao0nA4GKyusXzZT4wWrrr8YuLu8kRDvLl1zimiQWs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2041:: with SMTP id t1mr6810110ljo.202.1605022608722; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:36:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5fa8e9d4.1c69fb81.5d889.5c64@mx.google.com> <5fa9b34f132a5_8c0e208ca@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <5fa9b34f132a5_8c0e208ca@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> From: Menglong Dong Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:36:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: fix misspellings using misspell-fixer tool To: John Fastabend Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Jamal Hadi Salim , xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIFDDrXJrbw==?= , David Miller , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@chromium.org, netdev , LKML , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Menglong Dong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi, John. On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:23 AM John Fastabend wrote: > > Hi, you will want to add net-next to the [PATCH *] line next time > to make it clear this is for net-next. The contents make it > obvious in this case though. > > Also I'm not sure why the bpf@ include but OK. Thanks for your suggestion, and I will pay attention to the [PATCH *] next time. As for the bpf@, I guess that 'get_maintainer.pl' listed it to me because of 'act_bpf.c'. Cheers, Menglong Dong