From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
To: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Wilson Kok <wkok@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 3/4] rocker: Handle IFF_PROTODOWN by doing a PHYS-DOWN on the switch port.
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:51:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bD=QPViX4Fig7TSS+P3XdBHWG=Ei_LOPcBYi+4qGhhaew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACcJQnRjQbmK_PqOgga-hT5vBDBGCXTRbuDXfoFDuODZJHQ9tw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Anuradha Karuppiah
<anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Anuradha Karuppiah
>> <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:38 AM, <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> IFF_PROTODOWN can be set by user space applications like MLAG on detecting
>>>>> errors on a switch port. This patch provides sample switch driver changes
>>>>> for handling IFF_PROTODOWN. Rocker PHYS disables the port in response to
>>>>> protodown.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: I understand Scott has some rocker changes on hold. I will re-spin
>>>>> this patch once his changes are in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>>>> index a87b177..e3084e3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>>>> @@ -3838,7 +3838,8 @@ static int rocker_port_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>>>>
>>>>> napi_enable(&rocker_port->napi_tx);
>>>>> napi_enable(&rocker_port->napi_rx);
>>>>> - rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, true);
>>>>> + if (!(dev->flags & IFF_PROTO_DOWN))
>>>>> + rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, true);
>>>>> netif_start_queue(dev);
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -4238,6 +4239,18 @@ static int rocker_port_swdev_port_stp_update(struct net_device *dev, u8 state)
>>>>> return rocker_port_stp_update(rocker_port, state);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static int rocker_port_swdev_port_phy_state_set(struct net_device *dev,
>>>>> + bool enable)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct rocker_port *rocker_port = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (enable && (dev->flags & IFF_UP) && !(dev->flags & IFF_PROTO_DOWN))
>>>>> + rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, true);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, false);
>>>>
>>>> This isn't working like your expecting. PHY link is still up on the
>>>> rocker port, so the other end of the wire still sees link UP even when
>>>> IFF_PROTO_DOWN is set locally.
>>>
>>> I wanted to check with you first on the rocker handling; that is the main
>>> reason for posting this an RFC (thanks for the review).
>>>
>>> I used rocker_port_set_enable/PORT_PHYS_ENABLE for setting the phy state
>>> because I assumed that in the case of an offloaded switch driver it would be
>>> the equivalent of doing "sdk port N en=1|0". Is that not the case? If not,
>>> could you please point me in the right direction?
>>
>> To put PHY link down, on PORT_PHYS_ENABLE true, rocker device (qemu)
>> would need to down the link state for the port so other end of wire
>> sees link down. I think I remember looking into that but didn't
>> implement it. In qemu monitor, you can manually set the link up/down
>> (set_link <dev> [on|off]). We'd need to call the same from within the
>> rocker device.
>>
>> So if we want to be able to test this with rocker, we'll need a device
>> and driver change.
>
> Thanks for the details, Scott. We will looking into implementing the necessary
> changes to get it working with rocker.
Hmmm....looks like we can only go so far using rocker. The patch
below for rocker device will set link up/down when phy is
enabled/disabled, but that only affects the local link status. The
remote will not see link down/up when the local changes because there
is no physical signalling between two VM instances (local and remote)
(duh!). I'll add the device patch to my queue just because it's a
good things to have, but at this point I'm not seeing how you can use
rocker to down the remote link.
diff --git a/hw/net/rocker/rocker_fp.c b/hw/net/rocker/rocker_fp.c
index 42354c3..d8d934c 100644
--- a/hw/net/rocker/rocker_fp.c
+++ b/hw/net/rocker/rocker_fp.c
@@ -188,8 +188,19 @@ bool fp_port_enabled(FpPort *port)
return port->enabled;
}
+static void fp_port_set_link(FpPort *port, bool up)
+{
+ NetClientState *nc = qemu_get_queue(port->nic);
+
+ if (up == nc->link_down) {
+ nc->link_down = !up;
+ nc->info->link_status_changed(nc);
+ }
+}
+
void fp_port_enable(FpPort *port)
{
+ fp_port_set_link(port, true);
port->enabled = true;
DPRINTF("port %d enabled\n", port->index);
}
@@ -197,6 +208,7 @@ void fp_port_enable(FpPort *port)
void fp_port_disable(FpPort *port)
{
port->enabled = false;
+ fp_port_set_link(port, false);
DPRINTF("port %d disabled\n", port->index);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-27 17:38 [RFC PATCH net-next v3 3/4] rocker: Handle IFF_PROTODOWN by doing a PHYS-DOWN on the switch port anuradhak
2015-04-28 5:51 ` Scott Feldman
2015-04-28 15:49 ` Anuradha Karuppiah
2015-04-28 19:48 ` Scott Feldman
2015-04-28 20:35 ` Anuradha Karuppiah
2015-04-29 5:51 ` Scott Feldman [this message]
2015-04-29 22:11 ` Anuradha Karuppiah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAE4R7bD=QPViX4Fig7TSS+P3XdBHWG=Ei_LOPcBYi+4qGhhaew@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sfeldma@gmail.com \
--cc=anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=wkok@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).